On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 02:56:46AM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > The lack of support for the `in` operator is a major difference, but
> > there's also `len` (equivalent to "count the one bits"), superset
> > and subset testing, various i
The Windows version of pyconfig.h has the following construct:
if defined(_DEBUG)
pragma comment(lib,"python37_d.lib")
elif defined(Py_LIMITED_API)
pragma comment(lib,"python3.lib")
else
pragma comment(lib,"python37.lib")
endif /* _DEBUG */
which
This sounds like a good observation. I recommend opening a bug and
preparing a PR if you can (a PR would also help finding if there are any
problems with the idea).
On Dec 29, 2017 9:50 AM, "Yahya Abou 'Imran via Python-ideas" <
python-ideas@python.org> wrote:
> After I generate an UML diagram fr
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> We already have a built-in immutable set for Python. It's called frozenset.
This is true, but AIUI its API is based primarily on that of the
(mutable) set. If you were creating a greenfield ImmutableSet class,
what would its API look like?
We already have a built-in immutable set for Python. It's called frozenset.
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:56 AM Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
> > The lack of support for the `in` operator is a major difference, but
> > there's also `len` (equivale
After I generate an UML diagram from collections.abc, I found very strange that
MappingView inherit from Sized instead of Collection (new in python 3.6).
Yes, MappingView only define __len__ and not __iter__ and __contains__, but all
of its subclasses define them (KeysView, ValuesView and ItemVi
29.12.17 16:43, Nick Coghlan пише:
On 29 December 2017 at 22:58, Erik Bray wrote:
Okay, and it's broken.
Broken in what way? It has a fairly extensive test suite in
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/test/test_index.py
(and some additional indirect testing in test_slice.py, whi
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> The lack of support for the `in` operator is a major difference, but
> there's also `len` (equivalent to "count the one bits"), superset
> and subset testing, various in-place mutator methods, etc. Java has a
> BitSet class, and you can see
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:26:22PM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > Since ints don't provide a set-like interface, they aren't strictly
> > speaking bitsets. But in any case, nobody is stopping people from using
> > sets of enum values.
>
On 12/29/17 9:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
(*) I got curious and went through the maze of type definitions on
GNU/Linux. Which gives:
#define __S32_TYPEDEF __signed__ int
#define __PID_T_TYPE__S32_TYPE
__STD_TYPE __PID_T_TYPE __pid_t;
typedef __pid_t pid_t;
Regards
Antoine.
One
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 00:43:07 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> > That doesn't change my other point that some
> > functions that could previously take non-int arguments can no
> > longer--if we agree on that at least then I can set about making a bug
> > report and fixing it.
>
> The size_t, ssiz
On 29 December 2017 at 22:58, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>> 28.12.17 12:10, Erik Bray пише:
>>>
>>> There's no index() alternative to int().
>>
>>
>> operator.index()
>
> Okay, and it's broken.
Broken in what way? It has a fairly extensive test su
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> 28.12.17 12:10, Erik Bray пише:
>>
>> There's no index() alternative to int().
>
>
> operator.index()
Okay, and it's broken. That doesn't change my other point that some
functions that could previously take non-int arguments can no
longe
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Since ints don't provide a set-like interface, they aren't strictly
> speaking bitsets. But in any case, nobody is stopping people from using
> sets of enum values.
I'm not sure what "set-like interface" you'd be looking for, but the
built
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017, 09:23 William Rose, wrote:
> I had an idea that it could be helpful to have local functions as
> well as normal ones. They would be called the same way as normal
> ones but def would be replaced by internal and inside they could
> only access variables they have defined
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Franklin? Lee
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:01 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Franklin? Lee
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 5:21 AM, William Rose
>>> wrote:
I agree with the point that it should allow builtin but t
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 12:23:53PM -0800, Paddy3118 wrote:
> Hi Steve, I did not write an attack on the "Python devs".
I didn't say you attacked anyone and your implication that I did is
unfair.
> Re-read my
> original with a little less hostility and there should be room for an
> interpret
17 matches
Mail list logo
