(1) I am concerned with the proposal's ability to introduce variables with
a new broader kind of multi-line scope not seen anywhere else in Python. It
is difficult to reason about, particularly in constructs like lambdas and
inline def functions.
Limiting scope to the very same line is great:
> s
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 11:19 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
> PLIQUE Guillaume writes:
>
> > That's really interesting. I did not know there were so many way to
> > consider quantiles. Maybe we should indeed wait for numpy to take a
> > decision on the matter and go with their default choice s
PLIQUE Guillaume writes:
> That's really interesting. I did not know there were so many way to
> consider quantiles. Maybe we should indeed wait for numpy to take a
> decision on the matter and go with their default choice so we remain
> consistent with the ecosystem?
The example of R with 9
Joonas Liik writes:
> then it might be an acceptable compromise to have yet another...
"There should be one-- and preferably only one -- obvious way to do it."
The obvious way is to use the existing stdlib modules. So
> package that just imports os, pathlib, shutil etc and re-exports
>
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas
wrote:
>
>
> On 14/03/2018 17:57, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Søren Pilgård
> wrote:
>
> Of course you can always make error, even in a single letter.
> But I think there is a big difference between mixin
That's really interesting. I did not know there were so many way to
consider quantiles. Maybe we should indeed wait for numpy to take a
decision on the matter and go with their default choice so we remain
consistent with the ecosystem?
2018-03-16 5:36 GMT+01:00 Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.steph
If there it is desireable to have pathlib used to represent paths that do
not map directly to the filesystem..
then it might be an acceptable compromise to have yet another... package
that just imports os, pathlib, shutil etc and re-exports all relevant
functions.
i mean we are talking about conve
