On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Mar 25 2018, Guido van Rossum public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > I gotta say I'm warming up to := in preference over 'as', *if* we're
> going
> > to do this at all (not a foregone conclusion at all).
>
> I'm surprised that no one has mentione
On Mar 25 2018, Guido van Rossum
wrote:
> I gotta say I'm warming up to := in preference over 'as', *if* we're going
> to do this at all (not a foregone conclusion at all).
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned it yet, so as a quick datapoint:
Go also uses := for assignment, so there's some pr
On 30 March 2018 at 06:17, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> The fact that deep nesting of lexical scopes within an expression is
> almost always going to be an unreadable mess in practice is one of the
> reasons I don't think there's a strong case for either backwards
> compatibility breaks *or* significant