On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 6:34 AM, David Mertz wrote:
> You've misunderstood part of the discussion. There are two different
> signatures being discussed/proposed for a grouping() function.
>
> The one you show we might call grouping_michael(). The alternate API we
> might call grouping_chris(). Th
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 6:23 AM, David Mertz wrote:
> Guido said he has mooted this discussion
>
...
But before putting it on auto-archive, the BDFL said (1) NO GO on getting a
new builtin; (2) NO OBJECTION to putting it in itertools.
I don't recall him offering an opinion on a class in collect
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:53 AM, INADA Naoki wrote:
> But if it happens, I'm -1 on functools and collections.
> They are used very much. Every Python tool import them regardless how
> much of their contents are used.
>
really? collections? what for? I'm guessing namedtuple and maybe deque.
But
typeshed, dotted lookup, ScholarlyArticle semantic graphs with classes,
properties, and URIs
Would external metadata (similar to how typeshed is defined in a 'shadow
naming scheme' (?)) be advantageous
for dotted name lookup of citation metadata?
> Typeshed contains external type annotations for
... a schema:Dataset may be part of a Creative work.
https://schema.org/Dataset
https://schema.org/isPartOf
https://schema.org/ScholarlyArticle
#LinkedReproducibility #nbmeta
On Wednesday, July 4, 2018, Wes Turner wrote:
> https://schema.org/CreativeWork
> https://schema.org/Code
> https:/
https://schema.org/CreativeWork
https://schema.org/Code
https://schema.org/SoftwareApplication
CreativeWork has a https://schema.org/citation field with a range of
{CreativeWork, Text}
There's also a https://schema.org/funder attribute with a domain of
CreativeWork and a range of {Organizatio
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 9:45 AM David Mertz wrote:
> ..
> There's absolutely nothing in the idea that requires a change in Python,
> and Python developers or users are not, as such, the relevant experts.
>
This is not entirely true. If some variant of __citation__ is endorsed by
the community, I
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018, 3:11 AM Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
> Replying to the question in subject, I think it would be better in
> collections as a class.
> Having it just as a function doesn't buy much, because one can do the
> same with three lines and a defaultdict.
>
Four lines. You'll need to conv
There are some cases when that's the correct behavior. It mimics
pandas.DataFrame.groupby. For example, what if you have a sequence of (key,
v1, v2) triples? Group by key, then keep the triples intact is the right
choice sometimes.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018, 6:39 AM David Mertz wrote:
> Steven:
>
> Y
Steven:
You've misunderstood part of the discussion. There are two different
signatures being discussed/proposed for a grouping() function.
The one you show we might call grouping_michael(). The alternate API we
might call grouping_chris(). These two calls will produce the same result
(the first
I'm -1 on adding it in stdlib.
But if it happens, I'm -1 on functools and collections.
They are used very much. Every Python tool import them regardless how much
of their contents are used.
On the other hand, itertools contains random stuff very rarely used.
If you really want to add it in coll
On 4 July 2018 at 11:25, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 11:08:05AM +0100, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
> > Replying to the question in subject, I think it would be better in
> > collections as a class.
> > Having it just as a function doesn't buy much, because one can do the
> same
>
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 11:08:05AM +0100, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
> Replying to the question in subject, I think it would be better in
> collections as a class.
> Having it just as a function doesn't buy much, because one can do the same
> with three lines and a defaultdict.
> However, if this is a
Replying to the question in subject, I think it would be better in
collections as a class.
Having it just as a function doesn't buy much, because one can do the same
with three lines and a defaultdict.
However, if this is a class it can support adding new elements, merge the
groupeddicts, etc.
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
