On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:31 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 6:08 PM Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> I'm not sure if this is an issue the way Queue is used in practice, but in
>> general you have to be careful with this kind of circular flow because if
>> your queue communicates b
I'll just simply reply here that Mypy on our entire code base just silently
outputs nothing. Nothing at all. I tried to look at the code to find out why
and maybe implement the name checking feature discussed here and was terrified
by the Byzantine complexity of the code base. I gave up.
From
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 01:14:39PM +0200, Anders Hovmöller wrote:
[I wrote this]
> > I've seen far too many variables called (let's say) "mylist" which
> > actually hold a dict or a tuple (or in one memorable case, a string!) to
> > unconditionally believe the name.
>
> This is an even stronger
I switched this thread to the python-ideas list, since this is proposing a
new feature.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:13 PM Sean Harrington
wrote:
> I contend that multiprocessing.Pool is used most frequently with a single
> task. I am proposing a feature that enforces this invariant, optimizes ta
On 10/22/18 9:04 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
My IDE is Unix. (Technically, Linux.)
+1
Or just google https://duckduckgo.com/?q=unix+as+an+ide
Thank you for not verbing DuckDuckGo! :-)
... (I use an actual GUI editor, not
Vim or Emacs) ...
[ ... must ... resist ... holy war ... ]
Dan
_
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 02:35:40PM +0200, Anders Hovmöller wrote:
>
> > But the critical point here is that we should not add a language feature
> > to make up for the limitations of a single IDE. If the free version of
> > PyCharm is underpowered, perhaps you ought to try the paid version, or
>> This is certainly not something that requires language support. It can
>> easily be purely a convention, as long as different IDEs, linters, type
>> checkers, etc. agree on what the convention is. Maybe at some point in the
>> future, if the convention becomes adopted, there might be some
> But the critical point here is that we should not add a language feature
> to make up for the limitations of a single IDE. If the free version of
> PyCharm is underpowered, perhaps you ought to try the paid version, or
> another IDE, or submit a feature request to PyCharm, *before* turning t
22.10.18 02:16, Terry Reedy пише:
All
functions created from lambda expressions get the same pseudo-name
''. This can make tracebacks worse. Perhaps more importantly,
proper testing may become harder.
See https://bugs.python.org/issue34856. But this can work only while
lambda's body is a s
Am 21.10.18 um 16:44 schrieb David Mertz:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 3:18 AM Thomas Güttler mailto:guettl...@thomas-guettler.de>> wrote:
Now my idea: Per module and/or per file type hinting from variable name.
Maybe a magic docstring in the __init__.py file:
variable-name-mapping:
Nathaniel, thank you for the pointer to Trio.
Its approach seems very robust. I'm relieved to see that a solution so
fundamentally rebuilt has also settled on very similar semantics for
its `.close_put()`.
I think your `.clone()` idiom is very clear when the communication
objects are treated as di
11 matches
Mail list logo
