On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:07 PM David Mertz wrote:
>>> You might shoot yourself in the foot, but at least you know its the same
>>> foot you shot yourself in using the previous version *wink*
> I've lost attribution chain. I think this is Steven, but it doesn't really
> matter.
I think it was
>
> One possible argument for making PASS the default, even if that means
>> implementation-dependent behaviour with NANs, is that in the absense of a
>> clear preference for FAIL or RETURN, at least PASS is backwards compatible.
>>
>> You might shoot yourself in the foot, but at least you know its
On Monday, January 7, 2019 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-5, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> (By the way, I'm not outright disagreeing with you, I'm trying to weigh
> up the pros and cons of your position. You've given me a lot to think
> about. More below.)
>
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 11:31:30PM -0800, Nathani
