Calvin Spealman wrote:
The one positive I see is that because there is no open and closing pair
of backticks, like parens or brackets, you can't easily nest this syntax
and I actually like how it inherently discourages or makes that impossible!
Perhaps surprisingly, the backtick syntax in
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 05:56:17PM +1100, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[...]
> > And a few more examples for clarity.
> >
> > def example():
> > locals()['a'] = 1
> > expr = `a+1`
> > return expr() # error: one variable is required
>
> Still not clear to me. It might help if you showed expected input
> Backtick expressions work exactly like lambdas, except that they are bound to
> the instance they are created in every time that class is used to create one.
I would if possible very much like to see some real world examples of
Python code, that would benefit by being rewritten to use the new
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 9:43 PM James Lu wrote:
> Backtick expressions work exactly like lambdas, except that they are bound
> to the instance they are created in every time that class is used to create
> one. To illustrate, this “percent” property is bound to the instance, not
> to the class.
>
