On 05/27/2020 05:53 PM, Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas wrote:
No, I downloaded a 3rd-party package. I'm not sure if that's "specialist
sotware" by your definition.
I won't name it here, but it was dead easy to install and use and works
perfectly.
Personally I'd recommend it.
You'd recommend
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:42 AM Rob Cliffe wrote:
>
>
>
> On 26/05/2020 20:03, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 2:51 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >> But doing otherwise, having Undef be *not an object* but a kinda ghost
> >> in the interpreter, is a huge language change and I
On 25/05/2020 15:33, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 03:54:30PM +0100, Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas wrote:
I find having a RAM drive is very handy. Could this be another use for it?
Could be, if there's a standard way to create a RAM drive on all windows
machines without
APOLOGY: My e-mail client (Thunderbird) crashed as I hit Send; I don't
know if it was actually sent.
Therefore I am sending it again - sorry if it's a duplicate post.
Rob Cliffe
On 26/05/2020 20:03, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 2:51 AM Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
But doing
On 26/05/2020 05:03, David Mertz wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2020, 11:56 PM Christopher Barker
well, yes and no. this conversation was in the context of "None"
works fine most of the time.
How many functions take None as a non-sentinel value?! How many of
that tiny numbers do so only
The downside to the FTP solution however is that little metadata is present
about the versions
The FTP pages are primarily for downloading versions which isn't the aim of
the proposal, it's to be able to fetch the metadata.
Adding some sort of metadata file to all versions on the FTP server
On 27.05.2020 18:59, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 22:19:12 -0400
> Kyle Stanley wrote:
>>
>>> It could become more detailed about each minor versions, git tag, links
>> to changelogs, links to the repositories, to the docs, download links,
>> and so on.
>>
>> I don't know that it
On Wed, 27 May 2020 21:24:08 +0300
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 27 May 2020 08:18:11 -
> redrad...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Thanks Guido !!
> >
> > I have not known about `pyston` ... It is pretty good like for me
> > I will take a close look at this project
>
> A recent
Hello,
On Wed, 27 May 2020 08:18:11 -
redrad...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks Guido !!
>
> I have not known about `pyston` ... It is pretty good like for me
> I will take a close look at this project
A recent attempt to collect known Python JITs/compilers:
On 27/05/2020 18.59, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2020 22:19:12 -0400
> Kyle Stanley wrote:
>>
>>> It could become more detailed about each minor versions, git tag, links
>> to changelogs, links to the repositories, to the docs, download links,
>> and so on.
>>
>> I don't know that it
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 9:52 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 08:54:52PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 6:37 PM Steven D'Aprano
> wrote:
>
> > > > A NOT_SPECIFIED singleton in builtins would be pretty clear.
>
> > > Guido's time machine
On Tue, 26 May 2020 22:19:12 -0400
Kyle Stanley wrote:
>
> > It could become more detailed about each minor versions, git tag, links
> to changelogs, links to the repositories, to the docs, download links,
> and so on.
>
> I don't know that it needs to be said, but for now, I think we should
Greg Ewing writes:
> "Did the user supply a value for this optional argument?" is a
> simple and reasonable question to ask.
True.
> It deserves to have a simple and direct way of answering it that
> always works.
"Deserves"? I wouldn't go farther than "it might be fun to have"
that. In
Thanks Guido !!
I have not known about `pyston` ... It is pretty good like for me
I will take a close look at this project
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
