Chris Angelico writes:
> Possibly a better example would be path division in Python,
I would have chosen '+' for that operation for the same reason '+'
"just works" for sequences. It's a very specialized use case but
5 * pathlib.Path('..') / "foo"
makes sense as an operation but oh, the
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 20:48 Charles Machalow wrote:
> I may be in the minority, but sometimes it seems like having to spin up a
> venv, etc. to run a small script could be a little bit much.
>
>
>
> What if we have something like this POC I wrote:
> https://pypi.org/project/pyensure/
>
>
>
> We
I may be in the minority, but sometimes it seems like having to spin up a venv,
etc. to run a small script could be a little bit much.
What if we have something like this POC I wrote:
https://pypi.org/project/pyensure/
We could have a switch or python interpreter argument to have packages get
Rus:
"Также любителям бухгалтерии тоже Decimal просто необходим.
Я вот думаю Гвидо(создателю питона) надо ввести обозначение для
децималов например 'D'.А то вот float есть x = 0.012f, а для децималов
было бы удобно x = 0.012D или x = 0.012d...Причем если в выражении
есть децимал то все float int
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 4:23 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 12:55:43PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
> > On 2/09/20 3:44 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > >(9) Keyword-only subscripts are permitted:
> > >
> > > obj[spam=1, eggs=2]
> > > # calls type(obj).__getitem__(spam=1,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 12:55:43PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
> On 2/09/20 3:44 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >(9) Keyword-only subscripts are permitted:
> >
> > obj[spam=1, eggs=2]
> > # calls type(obj).__getitem__(spam=1, eggs=2)
> >
> > del obj[spam=1, eggs=2]
> > # calls
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:04:31AM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> The set case is non-trival (which you do discuss later), but could you
> provide an example or two here as well?
>
> I think:
>
> obj[foo, bar, spam=1, eggs=2] = a_value
> # calls type(obj).__getitem__((foo, bar),
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, 12:19 AM Christopher Barker
wrote:
> I may get a chance to look carefully at this in a bit, but for now:
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 6:38 PM Ricky Teachey wrote:
>
>> Sorry for all the replies but I'm honestly very unsure how do this
>> correctly under Steven's proposal.
>>
On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 05:20, Christopher Barker wrote:
> And, in fact, the current sytax is pretty tricky as well. Say you want to
> make a class that takes multiple indices -- like a Mtraix, for instance.
>
> your __getitem__ looks like:
>
> def __getitem__(self, index):
>
> as they all do. But
