On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 21:47 Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 09:05:43PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > Hm, for PEP 622/634 we looked at this and ended up making it so that this
> > is the default -- you only have to write
> > ```
> > {'spam': spam, 'eggs': eggs} = mapping
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 09:05:43PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Hm, for PEP 622/634 we looked at this and ended up making it so that this
> is the default -- you only have to write
> ```
> {'spam': spam, 'eggs': eggs} = mapping
> ```
> and any extra keys are ignored. This is because for the co
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 8:46 PM Stephen J. Turnbull <
turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano writes:
>
> > {'spam': spam, 'eggs', eggs, **who_cares} = mapping
>
> Shouldn't that be
>
> {'spam': spam, 'eggs', eggs, **_} = mapping
>
> 8-D
>
> Actually, I kinda like th
Steven D'Aprano writes:
> {'spam': spam, 'eggs', eggs, **who_cares} = mapping
Shouldn't that be
{'spam': spam, 'eggs', eggs, **_} = mapping
8-D
Actually, I kinda like that, it looks like the side-eye emoji! Or a
flounder, but that's a different kettle of fish.
-- Yet Another Steve
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 08:24:04AM +, Barry Scott wrote:
> > On 31 Oct 2020, at 06:35, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> >
> > I think we can promise that:
> >
> > * if the mapping on the right has missing keys, no assignments occur;
> >
> > * if the mapping on the right has extra keys, and there i
> On 31 Oct 2020, at 06:35, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> I think we can promise that:
>
> * if the mapping on the right has missing keys, no assignments occur;
>
> * if the mapping on the right has extra keys, and there is no double
> star target to capture the extras, then no assignments occ
