I'm currently learning about the GIL and how can it be removed. So I'm
confessing that I understood only half of your words and I can be wrong.
As far I understood by reading your long passage, the problem is other threads
don't get enough chance to run and the CPU-Bound Python process will re-
Hello!
If anyone didn't note, there's a PR about this topic :)
https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/24903
Cheers!
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.pyth
On 10/05/2021 12:43, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 9:36 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:04:58AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 9:57 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[...]
Is there an aim beyond saving two characters?
It would remove a l
> On 10 May 2021, at 20:23, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 10 May 2021, at 15:30, Sophist wrote:
>>
>> I don't know how many people will remember some work that David Beazley did
>> about a decade ago on how the GIL impacts multithreading performance -
>> essentially he instrumented the
> On 10 May 2021, at 15:30, Sophist wrote:
>
> I don't know how many people will remember some work that David Beazley did
> about a decade ago on how the GIL impacts multithreading performance -
> essentially he instrumented the Python interpreter to log how multiple
> threads competed for
I don't know how many people will remember some work that David Beazley did
about a decade ago on how the GIL impacts multithreading performance -
essentially he instrumented the Python interpreter to log how multiple threads
competed for the GIL and gave several presentations over the space of
Perhaps Off Topic, but for a good cause.
This year I met Jana Scroeder, a blind person forced to change jobs as part
of the social cost of Covid. Her outsider experience of computer coding
training became a wish to make things better. She has applied for a Holman
Prize ($25,000 over a year) to fun
how about:
```
try:
...
except E1 | E2 | E3 as e:
...
```
it's syntactically valid but is this again: https://bugs.python.org/issue12029
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 9:36 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:04:58AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 9:57 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> [...]
> > > Is there an aim beyond saving two characters?
>
> > It would remove a level of frustration. I've wa
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 10:04:58AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 9:57 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
[...]
> > Is there an aim beyond saving two characters?
> It would remove a level of frustration. I've watched a lot of novice
> programmers, and some intermediate programmers
+1 and -1 at the same time. I feel like :-
"This makes sense",
try:
# something
except E1, E2, E3:
# something
"This doesn't make sense",
try:
# something
except E1, E2, E3 as e:
# something
The second one according to this idea would be parsed as,
try:
# something
except (E1
11 matches
Mail list logo
