FWI, this is a previous thread.
https://discuss.python.org/t/add-a-dict-sort-method/5747
2021年5月30日(日) 1:57 Marco Sulla :
> Since `dict` now is ordered, how about a `sort()` method?
> It could have the same signature of list.sort(), with an optional
> parameter "by" that can be "keys" or "values
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 06:54:15PM +0200, Marco Sulla wrote:
> Since `dict` now is ordered, how about a `sort()` method?
> It could have the same signature of list.sort(), with an optional
> parameter "by" that can be "keys" or "values" ("keys" could be the
> default).
Dicts keep their insertion
Hello,
On Sat, 29 May 2021 17:29:26 -0300
André Roberge wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 4:54 PM Irit Katriel
> wrote:
>
> >
> > You can control what the traceback of exceptions you are emitting:
> >
> > "raise e.with_traceback(None)" should clear everything before the
> > current frame.
> >
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 4:54 PM Irit Katriel wrote:
>
> You can control what the traceback of exceptions you are emitting:
>
> "raise e.with_traceback(None)" should clear everything before the current
> frame.
>
I'm sorry, but I still don't see how. This particular line would still show
up.
Tr
You can control what the traceback of exceptions you are emitting:
"raise e.with_traceback(None)" should clear everything before the current
frame.
Or you can get clever and construct a traceback with only the frames you want.
On Saturday, May 29, 2021, 08:27:18 PM GMT+1, André Roberge
w
https://github.com/agronholm/anyio/blob/9eb4671547b01f5e3ba0e0ca602b6aceec15af86/src/anyio/_backends/_asyncio.py#L598
On Sat, 29 May 2021, 20:24 André Roberge, wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 3:25 PM Thomas Grainger wrote:
>
>> pytest uses __tracebackhide__
>>
>> https://doc.pytest.org/en
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 3:25 PM Thomas Grainger wrote:
> pytest uses __tracebackhide__
>
> https://doc.pytest.org/en/latest/example/simple.html#writing-well-integrated-assertion-helpers
>
Thanks for the reminder. Pytest takes care of traceback formatting for
users. Individual projects can of
On 29/05/2021 01:26, micro codery wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 5:07 PM Rob Cliffe
Comailto:rob.cli...@btinternet.com>> wrote:
On 29/05/2021 00:51, micro codery wrote:
I also don't know what should happen for complicated assignments,
and I think this
has been the death
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 3:38 PM Irit Katriel wrote:
> See this issue: https://bugs.python.org/issue31299
>
> This issue refers to https://bugs.python.org/issue16217 which talks about
lines "above" the one of interest (compared with those that I describe as
being "below"). It also talks about fi
See this issue: https://bugs.python.org/issue31299
On Saturday, May 29, 2021, 07:19:32 PM GMT+1, André Roberge
wrote:
With CPython, tracebacks obtained from code written in C can be extremely
clean compared with functionally equivalent code written in Python. Consider
the followin
pytest uses __tracebackhide__
https://doc.pytest.org/en/latest/example/simple.html#writing-well-integrated-assertion-helpers
Eg anyio sets __tracebackhide__ = __traceback_hide__ = True to remove
internal frames from user Tracebacks
On Sat, 29 May 2021, 19:21 André Roberge, wrote:
> With CPyth
With CPython, tracebacks obtained from code written in C can be extremely
clean compared with functionally equivalent code written in Python.
Consider the following test file where I am using a local copy of Python's
datetime.py module.
```py
from local_datetime import date
d = date(2021, 13, 1)
`
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 6:01 PM Chris Angelico
> But if you're okay with constructing a new dict, you can do this:
>
> d = dict(sorted(d.items(), key=lambda kv: ...))
>
Or to keep the same dict (not tested)
tmp = list(sorted(d.items()))
d.clear()
d.update(tmp)
--
Jonathan
_
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 2:57 AM Marco Sulla
wrote:
>
> Since `dict` now is ordered, how about a `sort()` method?
> It could have the same signature of list.sort(), with an optional
> parameter "by" that can be "keys" or "values" ("keys" could be the
> default).
Not really a thing - if you want th
Since `dict` now is ordered, how about a `sort()` method?
It could have the same signature of list.sort(), with an optional
parameter "by" that can be "keys" or "values" ("keys" could be the
default).
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.o
There's been a discussion in this list on extending Python to provide
SYNTAX such as
@decorator
name = EXPRESSION
and also suitable semantics. (Here 'name' is an identifier, in the
discussion called a 'variable'.)
This post is about providing SEMANTICS for such decorator syntax. We can do
>
> I just thought it looked better, but would you and others here like it
> better if the
> NEWLINE requirement was kept for all decorators? There is nothing in the
> original
> proposal that requires a single line.
> I also don't know what should happen for complicated assignments, and I
> think
Now it seems Python doesn’t need constant. There are many ways we can achieve
constants. Though constants may increase performance. Yet again it can also be
the opposite.
From: Paul Sokolovsky
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 12:44:09 AM
To: Shreyan Avigyan
Cc: pyt
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 07:37:57PM -0700, Brendan Barnwell wrote:
> I see your point, but I don't agree that static function variables
> are parallel to either closures or generators.
Okay, this is an important point, I think. I argue that some sort of
sugar for static storage in fu
19 matches
Mail list logo
