> I propose (not for the first time) that similarly concatenating an
unknown number of iterables or dicts should be possible via comprehensions:
I'm really happy to see this feature proposal come up again! Every time,
it seems this feature is even more intuitive to even more people, and I'm
ex
I like this comment.
The proposal to change list and str is way too ambitious. But some minor
cleanup might not be so pernicious?
On Saturday, November 13, 2021 at 5:31:49 PM UTC-5 Mike Miller wrote:
>
> I like this idea and disappointed it always gets a negative reaction. One
> of my
> bigg
I like this idea and disappointed it always gets a negative reaction. One of my
biggest peeves is this:
import datetime # or
from datetime import datetime
Which is often confusing... is that the datetime module or the class someone
chose at random in this module? A minor thorn that
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 3:52 AM Paul Moore wrote:
I love pytest, and I'm a happy user of it. But I've never wanted it in
> the stdlib. Because it's a developer tool, basically.
I have no problem with getting pytest from PyPi for my projects.
But there are two use cases where that’s less than i
On 11/13/21 9:59 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Mark Mollineaux writes:
> I'll simply say that while I am disappointed that there are so many
> frictions here for whatever reason,
For your personal use, you can create a module that just does
import nonPEP8module
pep8name = nonPEP8module.no
Mark Mollineaux writes:
> I'll simply say that while I am disappointed that there are so many
> frictions here for whatever reason,
For your personal use, you can create a module that just does
import nonPEP8module
pep8name = nonPEP8module.nonpep8name
...
_
On Sat, 13 Nov 2021 at 08:47, Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
>
> A final comment: I wonder if you're being too conservative. It's true
> that generally we prefer small targeted modules in the stdlib, but
> everybody needs tests (even if they don't know it ;-), and there might
> be quite large audienc
Jonathan Crall writes:
> But perhaps a subset of it (pytest lite?) might be isolated and
> considered for inclusion down the line?
*Anything* might be considered for inclusion, although Guido might
dispose of it with a simple "please, no". That is not going to happen
to your suggestion! :-) B
