[Python-ideas] Re: Revisiting a frozenset display literal

2022-01-31 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 01Feb2022 09:13, Chris Angelico wrote: >On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 09:02, Cameron Simpson wrote: >> On 22Jan2022 01:41, Chris Angelico wrote: >> >On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 00:56, Joao S. O. Bueno >> >wrote: >> >> At that point, I argue that despite adding still more things to >> >> the syntax, it i

[Python-ideas] Re: Revisiting a frozenset display literal

2022-01-31 Thread Cameron Simpson
[... big snip...] On 22Jan2022 01:41, Chris Angelico wrote: >On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 00:56, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: >> At that point, I argue that despite adding still more things to >> the syntax, it is one that will spare time in average than the other >> way around, due to the time people, nee

[Python-ideas] Re: "frozen" operator Re: Revisiting a frozenset display literal

2022-01-31 Thread Cameron Simpson
Joao, apologies for replying late - I never got back to this message. I wrote: >> Yes, but have you _seen_ the bickering about the existing bracket >> choices just for frozenset? Eww. Hence the going for a distinct >> operator >> altogether. Yes, I'd prefer brackets of some kind too, but they're

[Python-ideas] Re: Revisiting a frozenset display literal

2022-01-31 Thread Chris Angelico
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 at 09:02, Cameron Simpson wrote: > > [... big snip...] > > On 22Jan2022 01:41, Chris Angelico wrote: > >On Sat, 22 Jan 2022 at 00:56, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > >> At that point, I argue that despite adding still more things to > >> the syntax, it is one that will spare time in