Is there a non-performance regressive way to proxy attr access to
func.__name__ of the partial function (or method; Callable)?
Would this affect documentation generation tools like e.g. sphinx-spidoc,
which IIRC use __name__ and probably now __qualname__ for generating
argspecs in RST for HTML and
1: There are cases where one may need the __name__/__qualname__ of a given
callable. If someone uses partial to create a new callable, there is no
__name__/__qualname__ given. In my particular case, I'm logging what
callback function is passed to a different function... if someone uses
partial, the
+0
Questions:
1. What's the use case for partial having __name__?
2. Does this imply it should have __qualname__ as well?
3. What name would be given to (an inherently anonymous) lambda?
Notes:
1. I would prefer __name__ to be more qualifying like its repr (e.g.
partial(foo, "x") → "")
On Mon
Hey folks,
I propose adding __name__ to functools.partial.
>>> get_name = functools.partial(input, "name: ")
>>> get_name()
name: hi
'hi'
>>> get_name.__name__
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
AttributeError: 'functools.partial' object has no attribute '__name__'
>>> get_
