On Mon, Feb 27, 2023, 8:12 AM Wes Turner wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023, 5:42 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 08:33, python--- via Python-ideas
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thank you for the insight. I have some more work to do! I will share on
>> this thread again when I've made
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 02:06, Inada Naoki wrote:
>
> `-X importtime=2`
>
> This is expert-only tool. So no need for verbose name.
+1 that re-using existing parameter names is both concise and also convenient.
However: do we have an opportunity to make the parameter _value_ both
concise and also
Makes sense, will do so.
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/ar
I really appreciate the pointers, thank you. I will look into them.
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Mess
Thank you for your insight.
>I hope you are at least aware that over the years various multi-year attempts
>to create Python sandboxes ultimately failed to the point of being altogether
>abandoned.
Yes I am, I have looked at pysandbox and RestrictedPython and I believe my
approach, albeit very
I hope you are at least aware that over the years various multi-year
attempts to create Python sandboxes ultimately failed to the point of being
altogether abandoned.
Python and Javascript differ fundamentally that Python runtime is
intrinsically bound to I/O, like filesystem access - which is a t
On Sun, Feb 26, 2023, 5:42 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 08:33, python--- via Python-ideas
> wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the insight. I have some more work to do! I will share on
> this thread again when I've made further changes.
> >
> > If you have some time, I would be gr
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 20:58, python--- via Python-ideas
>
> > The base is not the master branch but the 3.11.0 release.
Maybe you should rebase it on main? That will need to happen if it's to be
usable, anyway, and it makes it far easier to review/discuss if you follow
the normal process for (pr
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 02:32, python--- via Python-ideas
wrote:
> Supply chain attacks are becoming a pressing concern in software development
> due to the large number of dependencies and multiple attack vectors. Using
> third party modules (libraries, packages etc) is always a risk but the tr
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 20:58, python--- via Python-ideas
wrote:
>
> Have you looked at the diff? It's not "1000+" commits as you claim. It's 17
> commits with most being README changes. The base is not the master branch but
> the 3.11.0 release.
>
> https://github.com/python/cpython/compare/3.11
Have you looked at the diff? It's not "1000+" commits as you claim. It's 17
commits with most being README changes. The base is not the master branch but
the 3.11.0 release.
https://github.com/python/cpython/compare/3.11...R9295:cpython:policy
I do not see why you cannot audit and run this (or
11 matches
Mail list logo
