Sorry, that obviously should have been:
d = [[0] * 5 for in range(10)]
So it's not quite exactly the same as your example.
On 30 March 2017 at 11:24, Allan Clark wrote:
> If there were to be special syntax for this case, I'd just allow an
> empty pattern, such as:
>
>
If there were to be special syntax for this case, I'd just allow an
empty pattern, such as:
d = [[0] * 5 for in 10]
This is exactly the same as your 'repeat_for' except that it is spelt
'for in', which means there are no new keywords. It would also be
allowed in for-loops in the same way as y
