rly impossible to justify adding a
> new feature to Python. This discussion is unlikely to lead to any
> meaningful action otherwise.
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Jacob Solinsky
> wrote:
>
>> So when getx is executed inside a let form, if it tries to read/write the
So when getx is executed inside a let form, if it tries to read/write the
value of X it interacts with the X entry in the let form's symbol table
before moving to find X in the global environment, right? That is similar
to what I was trying to accomplish in python, but with the local symbol
table o
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018, 12:44 Jacob Solinsky, wrote:
> I wanted the called, jumped to function to change state in the caller.
> From what I tried to do, passing locals() cannot accomplish this. I have
> made it happen in other languages though.
> In the R language, one can do
ct or pass that object to
> functions instead of the large number of variables that it encapsulates.
> You just use 'self' as a sort-of back-pack that carries around what you
> need.
>
> It's difficult to see what you're after from your Verb and Morpheme
> exampl
-Jumping to a function as opposed to calling a function
When a function is jumped to, it inherits the variables in the caller’s local
namespace and is free to modify them or add new local variables, unlike a
normal function call, wherein the caller’s namespace is inaccesible. At
present, the on
