of it.
Am I missing something? Is this supposed to work? Is the documentation
wrong?
Thanks,
Joy Diamond.
Program that shows that the class dictionary created is not what we pass in
--- Shows the actual symbol table is `dict` not `SymbolTable`
class SymbolTable(dict):
pass
members = Sy
o/descriptor.html
https://docs.python.org/3/howto/descriptor.html
Both of which need to be updated.
(This is not yet filed as a bug report; as first I am requesting a call to
something like `_PyType_Lookup` that is efficent; and once we agree on
that, we can created an updated reproduction of `type.__
is returned by `Point.y`, `type.__getattribute__(Point,
y)`, and `fixed__Type__getattribute`
3. The invalid value of `Point.y` is `2` as returned by the [emulated]
`__getattribute__` documented
https://docs.python.org/3/howto/descriptor.html
So I am requesting:
1. An efficient python way t
20:11, Joy Diamond пише:
> > Currently `type.__subclasses__` is not documented at docs.python.org
> > <http://docs.python.org> (and works in both python 2 & python 3).
> >
> > I would like to keep `.__subclasses__` and have it documented at
> > docs.pyth
l static type checking, and yes, this will
> occasionally result in changed recommendations for how the language should
> be used or how APIs should be designed, but no, this does not mean that
> we're planning to deprecate or remove existing runtime features.
>
> On Mon, Oc
ocumented.
Thanks,
Joy Diamond.
1. The google search: "site:docs.python.org __subclasses__" finds no
instances of the word "__subclasses__"
2. As for what the function does, it returns the subclasses of a class:
Consider the following program:
class Cryptog
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 10:00 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 12:53 PM Joy Diamond wrote:
> >> - type(x) and x.__class__ don't necessarily agree; under what
> >> circumstances are each used?
> >>
> >> (I've asked this befor
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 8:02 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> I don't think it is obvious that the behaviour is correct. Presumably
> Joy had a use-case for overriding isinstance(), and this optimization
> prevented it.
>
> Joy, can you comment on your use-case, and did you come up with a
> work-aroun
Thanks, Terry.
As per your suggestion, I have submitted it as a bug report to:
https://bugs.python.org/issue35083
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 4:09 PM Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 10/27/2018 2:53 PM, Joy Diamond wrote:
> > Chris,
> >
> > Yes, the following works:
> > "&qu
e(x)`.
For example the actual code reference above:
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Objects/abstract.c#L2397-L2405
Says "if (Py_TYPE(inst) == (PyTypeObject *)cls)" in the actual C Python
implementation:
So it using `type(x)` not `x.__class__`
Thanks,
Joy Diamond.
A
simple code above ...
One of the best things about python is how accurate and consistent the
documentation is.
This request is to keep these high standards.
Thanks,
Joy Diamond.
NOTE: I'm not sure where to post this, so posting to python-ideas, in case
people want to discuss getting rid of
11 matches
Mail list logo
