On Fri, Sep 1, 2017, at 02:04 PM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:50:13PM +0200, Tarek Ziad??
> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > For large archives, I want to display a progress bar while the archive
> > is being extracted with:
> >
> > https://docs.python.org/3/library/tarfi
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017, at 02:18 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
[..]
>
> Sounds like a reasonable enhancement, but for your particular use
> couldn't you just subclass TarFile and call your progress callback at
> the end of the extract method after the base class extract?
Yes that's what I ended up doing.
Tarek
--
Tarek Ziadé | coding: https://ziade.org | running: https://foule.es |
twitter: @tarek_ziade
___
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.or
> Another note about the proposal: calling it "deprecated" seems odd,
> since the proposal is really just a general-purpose callback. argparse
> isn't generating the warning, your callback function would be doing it.
> Why name it "deprecated"? How is this different than the "action"
> keyword
erride it etc.
Another interesting approach suggest by Doug Hellman, which I like as
much, is a set of higher level options that
provide a deprecation workflow for arguments, see
https://github.com/openstack/oslo.config/blob/master/oslo_config/cfg.py#L441
What do you think?
Cheers
Tare
Ah! I havn't thought about that because in my use case the deque is
append-only so once it's full it discards older elements.
I guess what I really need is a regular FIFO Queue
Thanks for the feedback !
--
Tarek Ziadé | coding: https://ziade.org | running: https://foule.es
people think it's a good idea, I can add a ticket in the tracker and
try to provide a patch for the collections module maintainer.
If this was already talked about, or is a bad idea, sorry! :)
Cheers
Tarek
--
Tarek Ziadé | coding: https://ziade.org | running: https://foule.es |
twitter: @tarek_
