[Python-ideas] Fwd: NAN handling in the statistics module

2019-01-10 Thread David Mertz
> > One possible argument for making PASS the default, even if that means >> implementation-dependent behaviour with NANs, is that in the absense of a >> clear preference for FAIL or RETURN, at least PASS is backwards compatible. >> >> You might shoot yourself in the foot, but at least you know its

Re: [Python-ideas] Fwd: NAN handling in the statistics module

2019-01-10 Thread Jonathan Fine
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:07 PM David Mertz wrote: >>> You might shoot yourself in the foot, but at least you know its the same >>> foot you shot yourself in using the previous version *wink* > I've lost attribution chain. I think this is Steven, but it doesn't really > matter. I think it was