Hi,
Sorry from being late, i was in professional trip to Pycon FR.
I see that the subject is divising advises.
Reading responses, i have impression that my proposal has been saw as
mandatory, that i don't want of course. As previously said, i see this
"PEP" as an informational PEP. So it's a
One of my hesitations on this topic is that it could create a false sense of
security. And I mean security in both the 'comfortable with the code base'
sense leading to insufficient testing, as well as 'we have a top-notch quality
level, there are no vulnerabilities'. The one thing that I keep c
On 9/20/17, alexandre.gal...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
> But i think, as wee need to avoid to talk about any tool name in the PEP,
> we need to avoid to give a code example. The aim of this proposal is to
> have a guideline on minimal metrics to have minimal quality.
Michel Foucault wrote book
(ht
