Hello,
On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 07:26:27 -0800
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> This was intentional in PEP 572 so it is not a grammar bug fix.
>
> Put your money where your mouth is, or become another armchair
> language designer. Your choice.
Thanks for encouragement ;-). Adding "const" on the language
This was intentional in PEP 572 so it is not a grammar bug fix.
Put your money where your mouth is, or become another armchair language
designer. Your choice.
On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 23:58 Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:10:55 -0800
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> > Hi
Hello,
On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 13:10:55 -0800
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> I suggest that you just go straight to the PEP phase.
Thanks. In all fairness, I don't expect immediate resolution to this
issue. But I'm aware of out for at least a year, and keep returning to
it (yes, in context
Hi Paul,
I suggest that you just go straight to the PEP phase.
--Guido
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 11:54 PM Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Everyone knows how hard to find a compelling usecase for the assignment
> expression operator (":=", colloquially "walrus operator").
>
