Link is broken :/
It should be https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/issues/5810
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.
Yep, thanks for the explanation!
After some more research into this it appears this exact situation is
accounted for within the `SQLAlchemy` library (reference:
https://github.com/sqlalchemy/sqlalchemy/issues/5810)! Additionally, due
to the complications brought up in this thread it seems like it
Thank you for reviewing my proposal.
First and foremost, let me address the use case for this feature. I have an
`SQL` database where I store `itertools.cycle` objects (via pickling) and I use
SQLAlchemy to interact with this database. Whenever I "update" the cycler, by
calling `next` on the
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 05:30:52PM -0800, Andres Torres wrote:
> As the title suggests, I am requesting an user defined __eq__ method for
> the itertools.cycle class. A suggestion for how equivalency might work is
> that __eq__ would return True if two cyclers have the same iterable and are
> at
