IDK that a DeprecationWarning would be helpful or necessary?
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/02519f75d15b063914a11351da30178ca4ceb54b/Lib/calendar.py#L625
:
```python
monthcalendar = c.monthdayscalendar
prweek = c.prweek
week = c.formatweek
weekheader = c.formatweekheader
prmonth = c.prmon
Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer Wrote in message:r
> Greetings list,In the calendar module, i find it terribly unintuitive to have
> a calendar.month but not a calendar.year, the default being
> calendar.calendarSuggestion: replace calendar.calendar by
> calendar.yearYours,Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeerpyth
> Replacing it would break backward compatibility. But adding a year
function as an alias for calendar wouldn’t. And you could note in > the
docs that year is preferred for new code, or even deprecate the old name
over a few versions if it seems worth it.
> What about prcal (as opposed to pryear)
On Nov 27, 2019, at 12:39, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
wrote:
>
>
> In the calendar module, i find it terribly unintuitive to have a
> calendar.month but not a calendar.year, the default being calendar.calendar
>
> Suggestion: replace calendar.calendar by calendar.year
Replacing it would break
