On Oct 9, 2019, at 20:56, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> What you may want to consider is backporting the exact argparse.py
> from Python 3.7. It's a fairly straight-forward module and will
> probably work fine on 3.6. That way, once you upgrade to 3.7, it'll
> keep working the exact same way.
The ar
brent bejot writes:
> Sigh, well at least I know it was a good idea! Thanks so much!
As I was telling potential advisees a few minutes ago, it's not
getting the right answer that gets you a Nobel Prize, it's asking the
right question!
You'll find more good ideas, I'm sure.
Steve
--
Associat
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:37 PM brent bejot wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 11:01 PM Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
>>
>> I believe you want Python 3.7's parse_intermixed_args:
>> https://docs.python.org/3/library/argparse.html#argparse.ArgumentParser.parse_intermixed_args
>>
>> A quick test seems t
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 11:01 PM Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
> I believe you want Python 3.7's parse_intermixed_args:
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/argparse.html#argparse.ArgumentParser.parse_intermixed_args
>
> A quick test seems to work:
>
>
> import argparse
>
> p = argparse.ArgumentParser()
> p
I believe you want Python 3.7's parse_intermixed_args:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/argparse.html#argparse.ArgumentParser.parse_intermixed_args
A quick test seems to work:
import argparse
p = argparse.ArgumentParser()
p.add_argument('files', nargs='*')
p.add_argument('-f', '--force', actio
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 1:50 PM brent bejot wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Aspiring contributor here. I am not at all certain that this is the right
> place to discuss this. Do refer me to a better location if I'm out of place.
>
This is the perfect place to discuss this! Welcome on in.
> I would
