Oscar Benjamin writes:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 02:49, Stephen J. Turnbull
> wrote:
> > Thing is, this "mutual inclusion" condition isn't really about parsing
> > (ie, syntax)[1]; this is about semantics -- like all input validation.
> > I don't object to having it in argparse, but it's goin
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 02:49, Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
>
> David Mertz writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:38 PM Paul Korir wrote:
> >
> > > I've been using the argparse library for a long time and one use case
> that
> > > repeatedly shows us is the need to have two arguments appear tog
David Mertz writes:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:38 PM Paul Korir wrote:
>
> > I've been using the argparse library for a long time and one use case that
> > repeatedly shows us is the need to have two arguments appear together i.e
> > either both appear or none of them appear. I'll refer to
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 1:38 PM Paul Korir wrote:
> I've been using the argparse library for a long time and one use case that
> repeatedly shows us is the need to have two arguments appear together i.e
> either both appear or none of them appear. I'll refer to these as *mutually
> inclusive* in
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 8:39 AM Paul Korir wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been using the argparse library for a long time and one use case that
> repeatedly shows us is the need to have two arguments appear together i.e
> either both appear or none of them appear. I'll refer to these as *mutually
> in
