On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 at 19:24, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:06 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-01-10 at 18:38:12 +0100,
> > Alex Prengère wrote:
> > > 3. Use timeit. The scripts have no side effects so repeating their
> > > execution the way timeit does, works for me.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:06 AM Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On 2021-01-10 at 18:38:12 +0100,
> Alex Prengère wrote:
> > 3. Use timeit. The scripts have no side effects so repeating their
> > execution the way timeit does, works for me. The only issue is that,
> > as far as I know, timeit only allows
On 2021-01-10 at 18:38:12 +0100,
Alex Prengère wrote:
> 3. Use timeit. The scripts have no side effects so repeating their
> execution the way timeit does, works for me. The only issue is that,
> as far as I know, timeit only allows statements as input parameters,
> not the whole script, like for
On 2021-01-10 at 18:38:12 +0100,
Alex Prengère wrote:
> Today I had a quite simple need, I am unsure about the best way to do
> it, and saw a possible improvement for the *timeit *module.
>
> I have about 30 Python scripts and I want to measure precisely their
> execution times, without
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:42 AM Alex Prengère wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Today I had a quite simple need, I am unsure about the best way to do it, and
> saw a possible improvement for the timeit module.
>
> I have about 30 Python scripts and I want to measure precisely their
> execution times, without
