Michel Desmoulin writes:
> You are assuming a namedtuple litteral would mean
> collections.namedtuple would lose the type hability. It's not the
> case. The litterals can be complement, not a remplacement.
Unlikely to fly in Python. We really don't like things that have
"obvious semantics"
Le 24/07/2017 à 13:45, Ethan Furman a écrit :
> [redirecting back to list]
>
> On 07/24/2017 04:19 AM, Michel Desmoulin wrote:
>> Le 24/07/2017 à 13:02, Ethan Furman a écrit :
>>> On 07/23/2017 10:47 AM, Michel Desmoulin wrote:
>
I'm not sure why everybody have such a grip on the type.
On 07/23/2017 10:47 AM, Michel Desmoulin wrote:
> I'm not sure why everybody have such a grip on the type.
If I understand the goal of "a new namedtuple" correctly, it is not to come up with yet another namedtuple type -- it is
to make the existing collections.namedtuple a faster experience,
