On 2016-08-16 12:46 PM, Moritz Sichert via Python-ideas wrote:
2. It's extremely unlikely that somebody will design a system that
switches coroutine runners *while async/awaiting a coroutine*.
Yes, I guess so.
But even in this unlikely use case, you can
easily stack finalizers following this
I've been finding that a common scenario is where I want to remove everything
in a directory, but leave the (empty) root directory behind, not removing it.
So for example, if I have a directory C:\foo and it contains subdirectory
C:\foo\bar and file C:\foo\myfile.txt, and I want to remove the sub
All,
I propose that support for SI scale factors be added to Python. This would
be very helpful for any program that heavily uses real numbers, such as those
involved with scientific and engineering computation. There would be two primary
changes. First, the lexer would be enhanced to take rea
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016, at 00:28, Ken Kundert wrote:
> Basically a scale factor and units may follow a number, both of which are
> optional, but if the units are given the scale factor must also be given.
So you can have 1000mm or 0.001km but not 1m?
___
P
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Random832 wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016, at 00:28, Ken Kundert wrote:
>> Basically a scale factor and units may follow a number, both of which are
>> optional, but if the units are given the scale factor must also be given.
>
> So you can have 1000mm or 0.001km bu
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Ken Kundert
wrote:
> I propose that support for SI scale factors be added to Python. This would
> be very helpful for any program that heavily uses real numbers, such as those
> involved with scientific and engineering computation. There would be two
> primary
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Nick Jacobson via Python-ideas
wrote:
> I've been finding that a common scenario is where I want to remove
> everything in a directory, but leave the (empty) root directory behind, not
> removing it.
>
> So for example, if I have a directory C:\foo and it contains
Ian Kelly wrote:
Should 1m be interpreted as 1 meter or 0.001 (unitless)?
I've never seen anyone use a scale factor prefix on
its own with a dimensionless number.
Sometimes informally the unit is omitted when it can
be inferred from context (e.g. "1k" written next to
a resistor symbol obviousl
Chris Angelico wrote:
If units are retained, what you have is no longer a simple number, but
a value with a unit, and is a quite different beast. (For instance,
addition would have to cope with unit mismatches (probably by throwing
an error), and multiplication would have to combine the units (le
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> If units are retained, what you have is no longer a simple number, but
>> a value with a unit, and is a quite different beast. (For instance,
>> addition would have to cope with unit mismatches (probably by throwing
>
On 25/08/2016 06:28, Ken Kundert wrote:
> All,
> I propose that support for SI scale factors be added to Python. This would
> be very helpful for any program that heavily uses real numbers, such as those
> involved with scientific and engineering computation. There would be two
> primary
> c
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Greg Ewing
wrote:
> Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> If units are retained, what you have is no longer a simple number, but
>> a value with a unit, and is a quite different beast. (For instance,
>> addition would have to cope with unit mismatches (probably by throwing
12 matches
Mail list logo
