Re: [Python-ideas] PEP 530: Asynchronous Comprehensions

2016-09-04 Thread Adam Bartoš
Hello, will await be allowed also in the "if" part of comprehensions? And what about the "in" part? (e.g. if I'm not mistaken, we may have an asynchronous function returning an asynchronous iterator.) Regards, Adam Bartoš ___ Python-ideas mailing list P

Re: [Python-ideas] Semantics for type checking (was: What should a good type checker do?)

2016-09-04 Thread Koos Zevenhoven
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 12:26:58AM +0300, Koos Zevenhoven wrote: >> On Friday, while replying to a post on python-dev about PEP 526 >> (variable annotations), I ended up mentioning things that I think a >> good type checker should do, which

Re: [Python-ideas] Semantics for type checking (was: What should a good type checker do?)

2016-09-04 Thread Koos Zevenhoven
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Koos Zevenhoven wrote: > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Koos Zevenhoven wrote: I wonder if it would be different if you wrote that as a single expression: x = 1 if cond else 1.5 x =

[Python-ideas] kw to be ordered dict

2016-09-04 Thread Arek Bulski
I have a piece of code that essentially reimplements OrderedDict. I have been wondering why the key ordered is not preserved correctly (tests fail). c = Container(a=1,b=2,c=3,d=4) self.assertEqual(c.keys(), ["a","b","c","d"]) self.assertEqual(c.values(), [1,2,3,4]) self.assertEqual(c.items(), [("a

Re: [Python-ideas] kw to be ordered dict

2016-09-04 Thread Riley Banks
This has been discussed before. See for example https://mail.python.or g/pipermail/python-ideas/2010-October/008445.html There's even PEP about this: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0468 ___ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://m