Re: [Python-ideas] Python-ideas Digest, Vol 118, Issue 124

2016-09-24 Thread Святослав Молодских
23 сент. 2016 г. 20:00 пользователь написал: > > Send Python-ideas mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > or, via email, send a message with subjec

Re: [Python-ideas] Delay evaluation of annotations

2016-09-24 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
אלעזר writes: > But _some_ people (medium-level, Steven, whose main language is > probably not Python) will not even know [function names are looked > up at runtime, and so the called function may not be why you think > it is] is the case. And the dinosaurs will have returned by independent e

Re: [Python-ideas] Delay evaluation of annotations

2016-09-24 Thread אלעזר
Thank you all for your feedback. I will try to respond to it in a way that will not waste your time, But to do that I still need an example for the stromgest issue raised - bacwards compatibility. It is not just the mere change that is incompatible, since _any_ visible change is incompatible in som

Re: [Python-ideas] Delay evaluation of annotations

2016-09-24 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
אלעזר writes: > But to do that I still need an example for the stromgest issue > raised - bacwards compatibility. Given that Nick has misgivings about the ease of actually implementing this, I think you need to present an implementation, and then we talk about how closely it approximates backwa

Re: [Python-ideas] Delay evaluation of annotations

2016-09-24 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:55 AM, אלעזר wrote: > Short-ish version: > > 1. Please consider disallowing the use of side effects of any kind in > annotations, in that it is not promised when it will happen, if at all. So > that a change 3 years from now will be somewhat less likely to break things.