My 2 cents is that regular expressions are pretty un-pythonic because of
their horrible readability. I would much rather see Python adopt something
like Verbal Expressions (
https://github.com/VerbalExpressions/PythonVerbalExpressions ) into the
standard library than add special syntax support for
> On 27 Mar 2017, at 15:08, Markus Meskanen wrote:
>
> -1, should we also include write_ini, write_yaml, etc?
>
Markus, You illustrate why this is a bad design pattern to implement. It does
not scale.
I attended a talk at PYCON UK that talked to the point of using object
composition
rather
On Mar 29, 2017 23:31, "Abe Dillon" wrote:
My 2 cents is that regular expressions are pretty un-pythonic because of
their horrible readability. I would much rather see Python adopt something
like Verbal Expressions ( https://github.com/VerbalExpressions/
PythonVerbalExpressions ) into the standar
>
> I attended a talk at PYCON UK that talked to the point of using object
> composition
> rather then rich interfaces. I cannot recall the term that was used to
> cover this idea.
>
>
Separating things by concern/abstraction (the storage vs. the
serialization) results in easier-to-learn code, *e
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Wes Turner wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Chris Barker
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>
>>> On 27 March 2017 at 15:40, Ram Rachum wrote:
>>> > Another idea: Maybe make json.load and json.dump support Path objec
I feel like that borders on a bit too wordy...
Personally, I'd like to see something like Felix's regular definitions:
http://felix-lang.org/share/src/web/tut/regexp_01.fdoc#Regular_definitions._h
--
Ryan (ライアン)
Yoko Shimomura > ryo (supercell/EGOIST) > Hiroyuki Sawano >> everyone else
http://
>
> I feel like that borders on a bit too wordy...
I think the use of words instead of symbols is one of the things that makes
Python so readable. The ternary operator is done with words:
value = option1 if condition else option2
reads almost like English, while:
value = condition ? option1: o
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Abe Dillon wrote:
>> I feel like that borders on a bit too wordy...
>
>
> I think the use of words instead of symbols is one of the things that makes
> Python so readable. The ternary operator is done with words:
>
> value = option1 if condition else option2
>
> r
Abe Dillon writes:
> My 2 cents is that regular expressions are pretty un-pythonic because of
> their horrible readability. I would much rather see Python adopt something
> like Verbal Expressions (
> https://github.com/VerbalExpressions/PythonVerbalExpressions ) into the
> standard library t
On 28 March 2017 at 01:17, Simon D. wrote:
> It would ease the use of regexps in Python
We don't really want to ease the use of regexps in Python - while
they're an incredibly useful tool in a programmer's toolkit, they're
so cryptic that they're almost inevitably a maintainability nightmare.
Ba
* Simon D. [2017-03-28 09:56:05 +0200]:
> The str integrated one also, but maybe confusing, which regexp lib is
> used ? (must be the default one).
>
Ok, this was a mistake, based on JavaScript memories… There is no regexp
aware functions around str, but some hint to go find your happiness in
th
11 matches
Mail list logo
