On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:40PM -0700, David Mertz wrote:
> This is pretty easy to write without any syntax changes, just using a
> higher-order function `compose()` (possible implementation at foot).
> Again, I'll assume auto-currying like the map/filter versions of those
> functions in toolz,
Hi, all!
I want to reply many people and it might annoy you if I write multiple
replies...
As a result, I write them all in one post.
--
To
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
-
You are right, of course. Mine does the order wrong. But an 'rcompose()' or
'pipe()' or 'funchain()' is easy enough to put in the right order.
On Aug 19, 2017 3:44 AM, "Steven D'Aprano" wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 10:33:40PM -0700, David Mertz wrote:
>
> > This is pretty easy to write witho
On Aug 19, 2017 3:44 AM, "Steven D'Aprano" wrote:
2) there's that unfortunate call to "compose" which isn't actually part
of the algorithm, its just scaffolding to make it work;
I see this as an ADVANTAGE, actually. We can save the composed function
under another name before applying it to vari
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Neil Girdhar wrote:
> Cool to see this on python-ideas. I'm really looking forward to this PEP
> 550 or 521.
>
> On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 3:19:29 AM UTC-4, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> 2) For classic decimal.localcontext context managers, the idea is
>> stil
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
> On 08/17/2017 02:40 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> On 17 August 2017 at 04:38, Yury Selivanov wrote:
>
>
>> ck.get_value() attempts to look up the value for that key in the
>> currently active execution context.
>> If it doesn't find
Cool to see this on python-ideas. I'm really looking forward to this PEP
550 or 521.
On Wednesday, August 16, 2017 at 3:19:29 AM UTC-4, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Yury Selivanov > wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here's the PEP 550 version 2.
>
> Awesome!
>
> Some of
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 09:05:36AM -0700, David Mertz wrote:
> You are right, of course. Mine does the order wrong. But an 'rcompose()' or
> 'pipe()' or 'funchain()' is easy enough to put in the right order.
Indeed.
I said earlier that your solution (corrected for its error) was a pretty
neat s
