It surely would be helpful. I still find it a bit too single-case oriented.
Maybe having an equivalent __sorting_algo__ property with a value of the
current sorting algorithm would be more general?
There could be a SortingAlgo base class, which could be extended into
classes like:
- SortingAlg
Hello. I have a following question: How come there's no such thing in
Python like starmap but which unpacks dicts as kwargs for fuction?
For example I have a format string like "{param1}, {param2}" and want to
get results passing list of dicts for it's .format().
Of course I can do that with
I don't really understand. You can do:
'{a} {b}'.format(**{'a': 1}, **{'b': 2})
Is that what you want?
> On 10 Apr 2019, at 11:09, Krokosh Nikita wrote:
>
> Hello. I have a following question: How come there's no such thing in Python
> like starmap but which unpacks dicts as kwargs for fuctio
I need smth like starstarmap('{a} / {b}/ {c}'.format, [{a:1, b:2, c:3},
{a:4, b:5, c:6}, ...])
On 4/10/19 7:48 PM, Anders Hovmöller wrote:
I don't really understand. You can do:
'{a} {b}'.format(**{'a': 1}, **{'b': 2})
Is that what you want?
On 10 Apr 2019, at 11:09, Krokosh Nikita wrote:
robertvandeneynde.be
Le mer. 10 avr. 2019 à 12:55, Krokosh Nikita a écrit :
> I need smth like starstarmap('{a} / {b}/ {c}'.format, [{a:1, b:2, c:3},
> {a:4, b:5, c:6}, ...])
>
That's
def starstarmap(f, it):
return (f(**x) for x in it)
That looks like a recipe, not a basis function ^^
_
> On 10 Apr 2019, at 11:55, Krokosh Nikita wrote:
>
> I need smth like starstarmap('{a} / {b}/ {c}'.format, [{a:1, b:2, c:3}, {a:4,
> b:5, c:6}, ...])
Seems overly specific. Why not merge the dicts then call formal like normal?
>> On 4/10/19 7:48 PM, Anders Hovmöller wrote:
>> I don't really
10.04.19 12:55, Krokosh Nikita пише:
I need smth like starstarmap('{a} / {b}/ {c}'.format, [{a:1, b:2, c:3},
{a:4, b:5, c:6}, ...])
Use the format_map method of str.
>>> list(map('{a} / {b}/ {c}'.format_map, [{'a':1, 'b':2, 'c':3},
{'a':4, 'b':5, 'c':6}]))
['1 / 2/ 3', '4 / 5/ 6']
_
I occasionally found situations where I want to raise an exception for
errors that can only arise because the developer made a mistake, for
example:
- an abstract method is supposed to be reimplemented and its execution
is supposed to leave some internal constraints of an object unchanged,
but the
You have AssertionError for that.
Elazar
בתאריך יום ה׳, 11 באפר׳ 2019, 1:10, מאת Stefano Borini <
[email protected]>:
> I occasionally found situations where I want to raise an exception for
> errors that can only arise because the developer made a mistake, for
> example:
>
> - an abstra
On 2019-04-11 00:09, Stefano Borini wrote:
I occasionally found situations where I want to raise an exception for
errors that can only arise because the developer made a mistake, for
example:
I use AssertionError for this. An assertion failure means "this is a
bug", so that seems the right cho
That's quite a good idea, but then I think it should be more explicit
in the documentation that the purpose goes beyond the assert statement
failure. I've never seen AssertionError raised manually.
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 23:15, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2019-04-11 00:09, Stefano Borini wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:15 AM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2019-04-11 00:09, Stefano Borini wrote:
> > I occasionally found situations where I want to raise an exception for
> > errors that can only arise because the developer made a mistake, for
> > example:
>
> I use AssertionError for this. A
On 10Apr2019 23:09, Stefano Borini wrote:
I occasionally found situations where I want to raise an exception for
errors that can only arise because the developer made a mistake, for
example:
- an abstract method is supposed to be reimplemented and its execution
is supposed to leave some interna
13 matches
Mail list logo
