Why not create a new custom class which has this function there? You can
use that object whenever you need the segments.
This is a very rare use case and doesn't make sense to implement that in
str.
On Wed, 25 Dec, 2019, 09:25 python-ideas--- via Python-ideas, <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
See my implementation, is generic and not only for strings. It could be added
to more-itertools, I suppose:
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/E452LQGA3XKU5ADPTG54XP36ENXDZN2B/
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-i
Excuse me again, I just relized that my algorithm was flawed. I just inserted
in my function the brilliant algorithm of Mark Dickinson and now it works:
import itertools as itools
def segment(it, n=1):
if n < 1:
raise ValueError(f"Number of segment must be > 0, {n} found"
If I can spend my two cents, I think the fact the most of you prefer | is
because is already how sets works. And IMHO it's a bit illogical, since sets
also support -. So I do not understand why | was chosen instead of +.
Furthermore, sets supports < operator, that gives you the false hope that se
Well, `json` and the other modules could add another standard: `serialize` and
`deserialize`
As an example, this is how I deserialize from a custom class:
def __init__(self, source):
path = None
try:
# most common case: JSON string
self._data_raw = js
On Dec 25, 2019, at 14:57, python-ideas--- via Python-ideas
wrote:
First, as a side note, you seem to have configured your python-ideas-posting
address with the name “python-ideas” rather than with a name that can be used
to distinguish you from other people. This will make conversations confu
Andrew Barnert wrote:
> On Dec 25, 2019, at 14:57, python-ideas--- via Python-ideas
> [email protected] wrote:
> > If I can spend my two cents, I think the fact the
> > most of you prefer | is because is already how sets works. And IMHO it's a
> > bit illogical,
> > since sets also support
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 1:12 PM python-ideas--- via Python-ideas
wrote:
>
> Andrew Barnert wrote:
> > On Dec 25, 2019, at 14:57, python-ideas--- via Python-ideas
> > [email protected] wrote:
> > > If I can spend my two cents, I think the fact the
> > > most of you prefer | is because is al
On 2019-12-26 02:09, python-ideas--- via Python-ideas wrote:
Andrew Barnert wrote:
[snip]
you seem to have configured your python-ideas-posting address
with the name “python-ideas” rather than with a name that can be used to
distinguish you
from other people. This will make conversations confu
On Wed, Dec 25, 2019, 9:11 PM python-ideas--- via Python-ideas <
[email protected]> wrote:
> On the contrary, on sets you can apply union *and* difference. And since
> union seems the exact contrary of difference, it's illogical that | is used
> instead of +.
Set union is self-evidently NO
On 12/25/19 10:06 PM, MRAB wrote:
On 2019-12-26 02:09, python-ideas--- via Python-ideas wrote:
Andrew Barnert wrote:
[snip]
you seem to have configured your python-ideas-posting address
with the name “python-ideas” rather than with a name that can be
used to distinguish you
from other people
I second that..
json.load/loads and json.dump/dumps should be more understandable..
On Thu, 26 Dec, 2019, 04:50 python-ideas--- via Python-ideas, <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, `json` and the other modules could add another standard: `serialize`
> and `deserialize`
>
> As an example, t
12 matches
Mail list logo
