Am Mo., 14. Juni 2021 um 11:12 Uhr schrieb J. Pic :
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 8:34 AM Thomas Güttler
> wrote:
>
>>
>> This solution has two drawbacks:
>>
>>1. It is too verbose. Typing "conditional_escape(...)" again and
>>again is cumbersome.
>>
>> from django import conditional_espace a
Am Mo., 14. Juni 2021 um 01:25 Uhr schrieb Chris Angelico :
>
> I'd love to have some sort of generic interpolation construct, but the
> use-cases all seem really weak...
>
>
It depends on your daily work. If you create many small methods returning
small HTML fragments,
then it really helps if you
Hello all,
I recently opened a feature request for pytest
(https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/8768) to find out if a warnings
filter capture anything.
Basic use-case: In big project with a lot of dependencies, the warnings filter
list can grow a lot. Currently the only safe way to fin
Sometimes it would be useful to be able to write:
def foo():
try: return thing()
except ValueError;
try: return otherthing()
except ValueError;
try: return yetotherthing()
except ValueError;
if shouldraise(): raise
But currently this needs to be written like so:
def foo():
try: r
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:51 AM Soni L. wrote:
>
> Sometimes it would be useful to be able to write:
>
> def foo():
> try: return thing()
> except ValueError;
> try: return otherthing()
> except ValueError;
> try: return yetotherthing()
> except ValueError;
> if shouldraise(): raise
Sorry - personally I think this is absolutely ugly :-) So I will bikeshed.
If this thread even go ahead - since the idea is not that bad, maybe
allowing `try` on the same line?
Then it would be inline with `elif` - but still structured "English like"
try:
statement
except ValueError try:
s
On 2021-06-15 10:13 p.m., Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
> Sorry - personally I think this is absolutely ugly :-) So I will
> bikeshed.
>
> If this thread even go ahead - since the idea is not that bad, maybe
> allowing `try` on the same line?
> Then it would be inline with `elif` - but still structure
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 09:48:48PM -0300, Soni L. wrote:
> def foo():
> try: return thing()
> except ValueError:
> try: return otherthing()
> except ValueError:
> try: return yetotherthing()
> except ValueError:
> if shouldraise(): raise
>
> Look at all that unnece
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:56:12AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Dangerous idea - my first interpretation of that syntax was that it
> would be equivalent to "except ValueError: pass", which would be very
> confusing (it's subtly different in your example with return, and
> drastically different
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:45 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 10:56:12AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > Dangerous idea - my first interpretation of that syntax was that it
> > would be equivalent to "except ValueError: pass", which would be very
> > confusing (it's subtly
10 matches
Mail list logo
