Thanks Steve,
This is very useful and actionable feedback. I'll work on the parallel
examples.
I'm pretty much sure, it might take few rounds of consultation to bring out
the value.
I will also seriously think through the PyPI as an approach, as I seem to
feel that OpenAPI is not really "all that
> that can be used (eg) for indexing
Even without it being used in as complicated a way as that it's *still* not
backward compatible because of the trivial case, as foo.endswith("") is
True.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 11:55 PM Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:42 PM wrote:
> >
> > T
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:32 PM Samuel Freilich wrote:
>
> > that can be used (eg) for indexing
>
> Even without it being used in as complicated a way as that it's still not
> backward compatible because of the trivial case, as foo.endswith("") is True.
>
I was talking specifically about the ori
On 2021-08-09 23:57:42, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:32 PM Samuel Freilich wrote:
> > Even without it being used in as complicated a way as that it's still not
> > backward compatible because of the trivial case, as foo.endswith("") is
> > True.
>
> I was talking specifical
Two possibilities:
1) the perfectly backward compatible, retrun False
2) the more pythonic, return the empty value of the object (i.e. "" for str)
___
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 12:03 AM Simão Afonso
wrote:
>
> On 2021-08-09 23:57:42, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 10:32 PM Samuel Freilich
> > wrote:
> > > Even without it being used in as complicated a way as that it's still not
> > > backward compatible because of the trivial
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 12:08 AM wrote:
>
> Two possibilities:
>
> 1) the perfectly backward compatible, retrun False
> 2) the more pythonic, return the empty value of the object (i.e. "" for str)
Please quote the person you're responding to, for context. Were you
replying to Serhiy?
ChrisA
09.08.21 17:05, [email protected] пише:
> Two possibilities:
>
> 1) the perfectly backward compatible, retrun False
> 2) the more pythonic, return the empty value of the object (i.e. "" for str)
The problem is that for backward compatibility it should return True.
And empty string's boolean val
I was just saying that using the bool return value as an index is a bit
obscure, compared to using it as a condition in an if statement. But even
in the more common use, returning the matched string is still a chance in
behavior.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021, 10:13 AM Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Aug
On Sun, Aug 08, 2021 at 11:30:20AM +0400, Abdulla Al Kathiri wrote:
> For me, it looks normal because I am used to seeing pattern matching
> for function parameters in functional programming languages.
Can you give us a few samples from other languages? The only one I know
is Haskell:
fib
10 matches
Mail list logo
