On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 2:17 PM Pablo Alcain wrote:
>
>>> B) Most __init__ params need specialized behavior, and are quite
>> distinct from what's needed by __eq__ and __repr__
>>
>> (B) is well covered by the current, you-need-to-specify-everything
>> approach.
>>
>
> I don’t see B as a “extreme
On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 11:54:47PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 6:40 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:11:07PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> > > Absolutely. However, this is not an "all Classes" question.
> >
> > Isn't it? I thought this
On 5/1/22 00:21, Christopher Barker wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 2:17 PM Pablo Alcain wrote:
>> It shows that out of 20k analyzed classes in the selected libraries
(including black,
>> pandas, numpy, etc), ~17% of them could benefit from the usage of
auto-assign syntax.
>
> I only read Eng
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 9:35 AM Ethan Furman wrote:
> My own thoughts about the proposal: It seems interesting, and assigning
> as-is arguments is a chore -- but I'm not sure
> using up a token to help only one method per class is a good trade.
>
Is it unreasonable to instead suggest generalizin
Hey there,
The `int()` function allows to specify a base to convert from, for example:
>>> int("foo", 26)
10788
Which is documented as:
> The base defaults to 10. Valid bases are 0 and 2-36.
For other common bases functions exist in the base64 module in stdlib.
I often need other bases, or b
On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 14:49, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
> The `int()` function allows to specify a base to convert from, for example:
>
> >>> int("foo", 26)
> 10788
>
> Which is documented as:
>
> > The base defaults to 10. Valid bases are 0 and 2-36.
>
> For other common bases func
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 1:16 AM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:11:07PM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote:
> > > > Absolutely. However, this is not an "all Classes" question.
> > > Isn't it? I thought this was a proposal to allow any class to partake
> in
> > > the dataclass
On Mon, May 2, 2022, at 7:03 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> The "alternate alphabet" case can be done by base converting and then
> replacing on the string. It's not the smoothest, so that counts a bit
> of clunkiness; but it's also not all THAT common (I can recall doing
> it for SteamGuard 2FA codes
02.05.22 08:03, Chris Angelico пише:
Let's not go as far as a PEP yet, and figure out a couple of things:
A PEP is necessary if we add Roman numerals and Cyrillic numerals, and
Babylonian cuneiform numerals to the heap.
___
Python-ideas mailing lis
On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 16:37, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 2, 2022, at 7:03 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > The "alternate alphabet" case can be done by base converting and then
> > replacing on the string. It's not the smoothest, so that counts a bit
> > of clunkiness; but it's also not a
On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 16:46, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>
> 02.05.22 08:03, Chris Angelico пише:
> > Let's not go as far as a PEP yet, and figure out a couple of things:
>
> A PEP is necessary if we add Roman numerals and Cyrillic numerals, and
> Babylonian cuneiform numerals to the heap.
>
I'm awar
11 matches
Mail list logo
