Very simple proposal.
E.g.
```
>>> l = [‘a’, ‘b’]
>>> l.get(0)
‘a’
>>> l.get(2)
None
>>> l.pop(1, default=‘c’)
‘b’
>>> l.pop(1, default=‘c’)
‘c'
```
Essentially to match them to those of a dict.
Current workarounds:
```
try:
a = b[n]
except IndexError:
a = default
# and
l[index] if -len(l
On Thu, 15 Jun 2023 at 06:04, Dom Grigonis wrote:
> So following Chris’ logic...
> If there are 10,000,000 python users on Stack…
> And we assume, that every user encounters such need at least 2 times a year
> (being very speculative here, would say conservative?).
That was me being VERY generou
Yes,
1. adding keyword argument for `pop`
2. implementing `get` method as it doesn’t exist at all
* This wouldn’t break anything for sure. Well… theoretically could, but I
find it hard to imagine anyone has written such code.
I like PEP 463. Looks simple and intuitive.
> On 14 Jun 2023, at 23
