Hello,
After some french discussions about this idea, I subscribed here to
suggest adding a new string litteral, for regexp, inspired by other
types like : u"", r"", b"", br"", f""…
The regexp string litteral could be represented by : re""
It would ease the use of regexps in Python, allowing to
* Serhiy Storchaka [2017-03-27 18:39:19 +0300]:
> There are several regular expression libraries for Python. One of them is
> included in the stdlib, but this is not the first regular expression library
> in the stdlib and may be not the last. Particular project can choose using
> an alternative r
* Chris Angelico [2017-03-28 16:37:16 +1100]:
> But I think a better solution will be for regex literals to be
> syntax-highlighted differently. If they're a truly-supported syntactic
> feature, they can be made visually different in your editor, making
> the distinction blatantly obvious.
>
> Th
* Simon D. [2017-03-28 09:56:05 +0200]:
> The str integrated one also, but maybe confusing, which regexp lib is
> used ? (must be the default one).
>
Ok, this was a mistake, based on JavaScript memories… There is no regexp
aware functions around str, but some hint to go find your hap
