Hi everybody,
I'm a Python dev since about 10 years. I saw that customers are more and
more curious about development process, talking from various reference
on which allow to define what they call "good quality code". Someones
are talking only about Pylint, other one from SonarQube, ... I se
Hi,
Thanks for your return, and link. I knew PyCQA but not the others.
It seems i didn't success to precise my idea correctly. I'm 100% OK with
you that this is not language role to indicate precisely which tools to
use.
But my idea is only to define basical metrics, useful to evaluate qualit
Hi,
thanks for your answer, and your questions. Very good draw. I printed it in
my office ^^
First i'd like to precise that, as in title, aim is not to gurantee quality
but minimal quality. I think it's really two different things.
About metrics, my ideas was about following (for the moment):
Hi, effectively it's one of the numerous tools whih allows to have metrics
on code. This PEP would not have to precise tools name, but it's a good
example ^^ ; and can give some more ideas on complementary metrics
___
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-id
Hi,
Thanks to everyone for your contribution to my proposal.
@Barry, I agree with you that each organisation needs to integrate the
"quality process" in their workflow. But before integrate it, this
"quality" process need to be define, at minimal, i think. I don't think too
this is easy to mea
Hi,
Sorry from being late, i was in professional trip to Pycon FR.
I see that the subject is divising advises.
Reading responses, i have impression that my proposal has been saw as
mandatory, that i don't want of course. As previously said, i see this
"PEP" as an informational PEP. So it's a
on't know how to
> categorically prohibit posting from there.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Nick Coghlan >
> Date: 26 September 2017 at 12:51
> Subject: Re: [Python-ideas] Fwd: A PEP to define basical metric which
> allows to guarantee mini
