Re: tarball vs. download URL

2009-04-07 Thread Waldemar Osuch
2009/4/7 Michael Ströder : > Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> >> Personally, I haven't had the need to search for a service that offers >> something like SF, including version control and bug tracking. I >> either use my own systems, or those used by the Zope developer >> community. > > I tend to either as

Re: tarball vs. download URL

2009-04-07 Thread Sidnei da Silva
2009/4/7 Michael Ströder : >> One candidate you could look at, if you have a minute, is Launchpad. >> They have all kinds of nice services, but there's one big drawback: >> They force you onto their own VCS (bzr). > > That's a show-stopper. I don't a want proprietary VCS. bzr is not proprietary. I

Re: tarball vs. download URL

2009-04-07 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Apr 7, 2009, at 18:38 , Sidnei da Silva wrote: > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Jens Vagelpohl > wrote: >> Personally, I haven't had the need to search for a service that >> offers >> something like SF, including version control and bug trac

Re: tarball vs. download URL

2009-04-07 Thread Michael Ströder
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > > On Apr 7, 2009, at 19:03 , Michael Ströder wrote: > >> Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >>> One candidate you could look at, if you have a minute, is Launchpad. >>> They have all kinds of nice services, but there's one big drawback: >>> They force you onto their own VCS (bzr). >> T

Re: tarball vs. download URL

2009-04-07 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Apr 7, 2009, at 19:03 , Michael Ströder wrote: > Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> One candidate you could look at, if you have a minute, is Launchpad. >> They have all kinds of nice services, but there's one big drawback: >> They force you onto their own

Re: tarball vs. download URL

2009-04-07 Thread Michael Ströder
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > > Personally, I haven't had the need to search for a service that offers > something like SF, including version control and bug tracking. I > either use my own systems, or those used by the Zope developer > community. I tend to either ask the folks at python.org what

Please test CVS HEAD on 64-bit platforms

2009-04-07 Thread Michael Ströder
Given another one of this famous Integer type errors [1] I'd like to encourage everyone to test python-ldap HEAD on 64-bit platforms. I'd also appreciate if people with more C knowledge could review the patches: http://python-ldap.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/python-ldap/python-ldap/Modules/functio

Re: tarball vs. download URL

2009-04-07 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Apr 7, 2009, at 15:43 , Michael Ströder wrote: > Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> >> On Apr 7, 2009, at 13:48 , Michael Ströder wrote: >> >>> Does that look correct to you? >>> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-ldap/2.3.6 >> >> Yes, that's great, thanks

Re: tarball vs. download URL

2009-04-07 Thread Michael Ströder
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > > On Apr 7, 2009, at 13:48 , Michael Ströder wrote: > >> Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >>> While we're on the topic of packaging, I have one more request: >>> >>> Please upload the software (the tarball) to PyPI instead of using the >>> Sourceforge URL as download URL. >> Does tha

Re: tarball vs. download URL

2009-04-07 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Apr 7, 2009, at 13:48 , Michael Ströder wrote: > Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> While we're on the topic of packaging, I have one more request: >> >> Please upload the software (the tarball) to PyPI instead of using the >> Sourceforge URL as download UR

Re: tarball vs. download URL

2009-04-07 Thread Michael Ströder
Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > While we're on the topic of packaging, I have one more request: > > Please upload the software (the tarball) to PyPI instead of using the > Sourceforge URL as download URL. Does that look correct to you? http://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-ldap/2.3.6 Ciao, Michael. ---