Hi Michael,
Thank you for all your hard work!
We are using python2.4.4, but only because of other software that is tied to
it and the lack of available time to upgrade.
Ron Teitelbaum
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-ldap-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi Michele,
Have a look at this http://www.grotan.com/ldap/python-ldap-samples.html I
thought it was pretty helpful. It's easier to build the ldif using the
modlist.
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:python-ldap-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michele Petrazzo
Hi David,
I had this happen before because I tried to do this:
Import aModuleName.py
I don't see that mistake in your code though, but maybe something you are
calling is doing that. You need to leave off the .py when doing import.
Hope that helps,
Ron
_
From: [EMAI
D]
> Cc: python-ldap-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: Killed Python2.4
>
> Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
> > ldd libldap.so
> > linux-gate.so.1 => (0x002d7000)
> > liblber-2.3.so.0 => /usr/lib/liblber-2.3.so.0 (0x00176000)
> > libr
dde000)
libsepol.so.1 => /lib/libsepol.so.1 (0x00d96000)
It looks quite different from your version.
Thanks,
Ron
> -----Original Message-
> From: Michael Ströder
>
> Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
> >
> > I know you mentioned that I should send you more info if I get an
&
libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x002af000)
libsepol.so.1 => /lib/libsepol.so.1 (0x004c1000)
Thanks,
Ron
> -Original Message-----
> From: Michael Ströder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
> > ldd libldap.so
> > linux-
Hi Michael,
I know you mentioned that I should send you more info if I get an exception.
I got a SERVER_DOWN and then retried the call manually and blew up python2.4
This is CentOS 5, python2.4.4, python-ldap 2.3.4
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/ldap/ldapobject.py", line 507, in
search
--Original Message-
> From: Michael Ströder
>
> Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
> > While polling it appears that we have to call result for every record
> that
> > is waiting to be read. Since we added a 250 millisecond delay between
> calls
> > larger queries are tak
Hi all,
We are experiencing something pretty odd.
CentOS 5 python2.4.4 python-ldap 2.3.4
While polling it appears that we have to call result for every record that
is waiting to be read. Since we added a 250 millisecond delay between calls
larger queries are taking a really long time.
def se
> From: Michael Ströder
>
> Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
> > I have a few questions about leaving a bound connection open for sharing
> > (python 2.4.4, python-ldap 2.2.1 - openldap 2.3-2.3.30 on Ubuntu 7.04).
> >
> > I'm using Async messages is there any benefit t
died so that I can reconnect a
shared connection if the connection dropped off? I tried unbind and
whoami_s but got a very nasty memory error after a very long delay.
Thanks for your help!
Ron Teitelbaum
-
Check out th
Hi Michael,
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Ströder
>
> Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
> >
> > I'm running into a problem with python open ldap connections.
>
> Do you mean python-ldap connections o
et a significant number of can not
connect problems that I handle with a retry.
The server died the first time we tried to put a significant load on it.
Does anyone have suggestions for fixing this problem or figuring out what is
leaving connections open
Hello,
I have to commit multiple objects. Can I use the modlist to store and
commit multiple objects at once. If so is it possible to order the objects
so that they commit a subtree before the leaves?
Thanks for your help!
Ron Teitelbaum
Hi Michael,
Thank you very much for your help. I will look at the exception handler and
ReconnectLDAPObject. I see the multiple calls to add_ext and the different
results, so you are right, it's me!
Thanks!
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Ströder
>
> Ron
nyway.
I'm running on Ubuntu 7.04 (VMWare). Python2.4. Python-ldap 2.2.1
I've attached the trace file. Any idea why I would get this result? If the
record was inserted then why am I getting this Can't contact error, and if
it didn't insert the record because it couldn
16 matches
Mail list logo