David Leonard wrote:
> Geert Jansen wrote:
>> Michael Ströder wrote:
>>> Well, setting an env var is not really a good choice when running within
>>> a multi-threaded web application... :-/
>
> yet another reason to avoid threads? :)
The multi-threaded approach gives me the possibility to use p
Geert Jansen wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
Well, setting an env var is not really a good choice when running within
a multi-threaded web application... :-/
yet another reason to avoid threads? :)
I was thinking how one could solve the problem of per-thread credentials
in python-
Michael Ströder wrote:
>
> Well, setting an env var is not really a good choice when running within
> a multi-threaded web application... :-/
>
I was thinking how one could solve the problem of per-thread credentials
in python-ldap (or python-ad).. I think it can be done with the keyring
crede
Torsten Kurbad wrote:
> ME, ME, ME!!! :o)
>
> I tried several krb5 modules lying around in the net so far - and none
> really worked! In fact, most of the implementations require an external
> kinit call, which is NOT what I intend to let my users do...
>
> So, I'd very much appreciate, if you thi
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Ah, ok. Interesting. Why don't you separate the krb5 module into another
> project. I guess some people might be interested in that.
>
> Especially my dream would be to support HTTP-Authentication based on
> SPNEGO/GSSAPI in web2ldap. But not only authenticating the user a
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>> Michael Ströder wrote:
>>
>>> Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>
>>>
You might be interested in the freeipa.org project which uses python,
python-ldap, turbogears, PyKerberos, and supports http authentication
with forwardabl
Rich Megginson wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>> Rich Megginson wrote:
>>
>>> You might be interested in the freeipa.org project which uses python,
>>> python-ldap, turbogears, PyKerberos, and supports http authentication
>>> with forwardable tickets.
>>> I don't think they support SPNEGO yet bu
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>> You might be interested in the freeipa.org project which uses python,
>> python-ldap, turbogears, PyKerberos, and supports http authentication
>> with forwardable tickets.
>> I don't think they support SPNEGO yet but patches are welcome :-)
>
Rich Megginson wrote:
> You might be interested in the freeipa.org project which uses python,
> python-ldap, turbogears, PyKerberos, and supports http authentication
> with forwardable tickets.
> I don't think they support SPNEGO yet but patches are welcome :-)
How does the browser send the tick
Michael Ströder wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>> You might be interested in the freeipa.org project which uses python,
>> python-ldap, turbogears, PyKerberos, and supports http authentication
>> with forwardable tickets. I don't think they support SPNEGO yet but
>> patches are welcome :-)
Rich Megginson wrote:
> You might be interested in the freeipa.org project which uses python,
> python-ldap, turbogears, PyKerberos, and supports http authentication
> with forwardable tickets. I don't think they support SPNEGO yet but
> patches are welcome :-)
Well, glancing over the code I w
David Leonard wrote:
>
> I am interested in a better GSSAPI binding for Python.. and have some
> incomplete code locally if anyone else is interested.
Well, how about contributing your code to another project?
Or how about creating a new project?
> To do credential forwarding, the gss is current
On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Torsten Kurbad wrote:
>> At Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:45:01 +0100
>> Michael Ströder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Ah, ok. Interesting. Why don't you separate the krb5 module into
>>> another project. I guess some people might be interested i
On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:31 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> Noah Gift wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Torsten Kurbad wrote:
>>>
At Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:45:01 +0100
Michael Ströder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, ok. Interesting. Why d
Noah Gift wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
>
>
>> Torsten Kurbad wrote:
>>
>>> At Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:45:01 +0100
>>> Michael Ströder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Ah, ok. Interesting. Why don't you separate the krb5 module into
another
Torsten Kurbad wrote:
> At Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:45:01 +0100
> Michael Ströder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Ah, ok. Interesting. Why don't you separate the krb5 module into
>> another project. I guess some people might be interested in that.
>>
>
> ME, ME, ME!!! :o)
>
> I tried several k
At Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:45:01 +0100
Michael Ströder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, ok. Interesting. Why don't you separate the krb5 module into
> another project. I guess some people might be interested in that.
ME, ME, ME!!! :o)
I tried several krb5 modules lying around in the net so far - and
Michael Ströder wrote:
Geert Jansen wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
I saw that kinit is started as a shell sub-process.
Actually Python-AD comes with a C module that wraps the required
Kerberos functions (see lib/ad/protocol/krb5.c). What you probably saw
is the use of kinit in
Geert Jansen wrote:
> Michael Ströder wrote:
>
>> I saw that kinit is started as a shell sub-process.
>
> Actually Python-AD comes with a C module that wraps the required
> Kerberos functions (see lib/ad/protocol/krb5.c). What you probably saw
> is the use of kinit in the test suite, where I use
Michael Ströder wrote:
> I saw that kinit is started as a shell sub-process.
Actually Python-AD comes with a C module that wraps the required
Kerberos functions (see lib/ad/protocol/krb5.c). What you probably saw
is the use of kinit in the test suite, where I use it to verify the
credentials acqu
Geert Jansen wrote:
> Mike Matz wrote:
>> Will this initial release work on Mac OS X? If not, are there any
>> plans in the future for Mac OS X?
>
> At the moment I have not tested Python-AD on OSX, but I would be happy
> to support it in a future version. This requires though that someone
> sends
Mike Matz wrote:
> Will this initial release work on Mac OS X? If not, are there any
> plans in the future for Mac OS X?
At the moment I have not tested Python-AD on OSX, but I would be happy
to support it in a future version. This requires though that someone
sends me patches, or that I find a wa
Will this initial release work on Mac OS X? If not, are there any
plans in the future for Mac OS X?
Thanks,
Mike
On Dec 8, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Geert Jansen wrote:
> All,
>
> with this email I am announcing the first public release of python-ad.
> Python-AD is a Python client for MS Active Dire
23 matches
Mail list logo
