James Andrewartha wrote:
>> Hmm, I don't know whether I want to endorse the use of module
>> ldap.cidict. Since Python 2.3 has support for sets now this is somewhat
>> outdated.
>
> The main feature of cidict is that it's case-insensitive - I didn't
> think Python's sets were? cidict is still be
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 14:24 +0100, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Well, actually it took more time to have a running latex environment again.
>
> I've committed many modifications to ldap*.tex but not all. Please
> review. Some new module descriptions are still not in there.
Looks pretty good.
> > On
James,
Michael Ströder wrote:
>
> I've started reviewing your patches this morning and I have some doubts
> about some details which need clarification. This will take a little
> bit. I will follow-up on this when I have some spare time left. Maybe
> tomorrow...
Well, actually it took more time
James,
first of all many thanks for your efforts working on this.
James Andrewartha wrote:
>
> Is there anything else I need to do to get these applied, and the
> version of the docs on the website updated?
I've started reviewing your patches this morning and I have some doubts
about some detai
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 17:27 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 09:15 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The first patch removes an invalid LDAP option. The second updates the
> > LDAPObject documentation, and the third updates LDAPObject docstrings.
> > Hopefully
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 09:15 +0800, James Andrewartha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The first patch removes an invalid LDAP option. The second updates the
> LDAPObject documentation, and the third updates LDAPObject docstrings.
> Hopefully I'll have time to look at updating the rest of the docs soon.
Here's on
