Hi
On 7 February 2011 19:29, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 02/05/2011 01:42 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 4 February 2011 17:35, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/03/2011 11:59 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
On 4 February 2011 08:32, James Andrewartha wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>
>>
On 02/05/2011 01:42 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 4 February 2011 17:35, Rich Megginson wrote:
>> On 02/03/2011 11:59 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
>>> On 4 February 2011 08:32, James Andrewarthawrote:
> [...]
Debian uses GnuTLS because OpenSSL has the non-GPL compatible
advertising
Hi
On 4 February 2011 17:35, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 11:59 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
>>
>> On 4 February 2011 08:32, James Andrewartha wrote:
[...]
>>> Debian uses GnuTLS because OpenSSL has the non-GPL compatible
>>> advertising clause, and libldap is linked into many GPL applicatio
On 02/04/2011 09:15 AM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Rich Megginson wrote:
>> OpenLDAP 2.4.23 supports Mozilla NSS (triple licensed
>> GPLv2+/LGPLv2+/MPL) for crypto
>> Fedora 14 and later use this instead of OpenSSL
> I see some benefits using Mozilla NSS especially with LDAP clients. But I
> wonder w
Rich Megginson wrote:
> OpenLDAP 2.4.23 supports Mozilla NSS (triple licensed
> GPLv2+/LGPLv2+/MPL) for crypto
> Fedora 14 and later use this instead of OpenSSL
I see some benefits using Mozilla NSS especially with LDAP clients. But I
wonder whether we could use it from python-ldap via OpenLDAP j
Michael Wood wrote:
> I do hold out some hope that issues like this in GnuTLS (or in
> the software using GnuTLS?) can get fixed, though.
The issues with GnuTLS are known since years now
I suspect that everybody setting up a serious (Open-)LDAP deployment just
builds with OpenSSL and ther
On 02/03/2011 11:59 PM, Michael Wood wrote:
> On 4 February 2011 08:32, James Andrewartha wrote:
>> On 04/02/11 03:31, Michael Ströder wrote:
>>> Michael Wood wrote:
On 3 February 2011 18:16, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 04:34 AM, Michael Wood wrote:
>> e.g. Ubuntu Lucid Lyn
On 4 February 2011 08:32, James Andrewartha wrote:
> On 04/02/11 03:31, Michael Ströder wrote:
>> Michael Wood wrote:
>>> On 3 February 2011 18:16, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/03/2011 04:34 AM, Michael Wood wrote:
> e.g. Ubuntu Lucid Lynx with libldap2-dev version 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.3 and
>
On 04/02/11 03:31, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Michael Wood wrote:
>> On 3 February 2011 18:16, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>> On 02/03/2011 04:34 AM, Michael Wood wrote:
e.g. Ubuntu Lucid Lynx with libldap2-dev version 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.3 and
python-ldap 2.3.10-1ubuntu1.
>> [..]
>> But I thought
Hi
2011/2/3 Michael Ströder :
> Michael Wood wrote:
>> On 3 February 2011 18:16, Rich Megginson wrote:
>>> On 02/03/2011 04:34 AM, Michael Wood wrote:
e.g. Ubuntu Lucid Lynx with libldap2-dev version 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.3 and
python-ldap 2.3.10-1ubuntu1.
>> [..]
>> But I thought it was wort
Michael Wood wrote:
> On 3 February 2011 18:16, Rich Megginson wrote:
>> On 02/03/2011 04:34 AM, Michael Wood wrote:
>>> e.g. Ubuntu Lucid Lynx with libldap2-dev version 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.3 and
>>> python-ldap 2.3.10-1ubuntu1.
> [..]
> But I thought it was worth a try to recompile OpenLDAP and link
Hi
On 3 February 2011 18:16, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 04:34 AM, Michael Wood wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm trying to do a search against Samba 4's LDAP server and it works,
>> but the bind and search are both successful, everything hangs when I
>> try to unbind from the LDAP server. If any
On 02/03/2011 04:34 AM, Michael Wood wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to do a search against Samba 4's LDAP server and it works,
> but the bind and search are both successful, everything hangs when I
> try to unbind from the LDAP server. If anyone could enlighten me I
> would be grateful.
>
> I've run i
13 matches
Mail list logo