Re: Thoughts on python-ldap 3.0

2009-01-10 Thread Michael Ströder
Please, stay on the mailing list. Olivier Sessink wrote: > Sorry for this very late reaction. > > What would be great is to have a higher-level ldap objects to > manipulate entries: > ldapconnection = new blabla() > ldapobjects = ldapconnection.search('uid=xyz') > if (ldapobjects[0]['sn'] == 'you

Re: Thoughts on python-ldap 3.0

2008-11-07 Thread Michael Ströder
Michael Ströder wrote: > Some ideas: Forgot one point: I'd prefer python-ldap to be part of the Python standard lib in the long run. New code would make it possible to meet the licensing prerequisites of the PSF for this from the very beginning. Ciao, Michael. ---

Thoughts on python-ldap 3.0

2008-11-07 Thread Michael Ströder
HI! Given that Python 3.0 makes good progress it's worth to think about how to provide a LDAP module for Python 3.0. Glancing over PEP 3000 it's pretty obvious that python-ldap could be changed more than just adding a few compability patches needed for 2.5 or 2.6 since Python 3.0 seems to be a pr