Phlip, 10.07.2011 07:10:
On Jul 9, 8:38 pm, Ben Finney wrote:
Phlip writes:
On Jul 9, 7:39 pm, mark curphey wrote:
Thanks. FWIW I played with a bunch (Freshen, Morelia, Lettuce)
Morelia is "undermaintained" because it's finished. It attaches to any
pre-existing TestCase-style test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
How should I go about switching from concatenation to string formatting
for this?
avs.write(demux_filter + field_filter + fpsin_filter + i2pfilter +
dn_filter + fpsout_filter + trim_filter + info_filter)
I can think of a few ways, but none of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 2011.07.10 12:55 AM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> Maybe it's been removed, but from the help file for my installation
help(file) returns a NameError in 3.2. It shows up as a built-in
function in the 2.7 docs, but not in the py3k docs. It's not me
Phlip writes:
> 'sudo pip install morelia' just worked for me, on Ubuntu.
The problem with ‘pip’ is that it's a parallel package installation that
ignores the available package management system on the OS.
That's not a fault of ‘pip’ or Setuptools or PyPI or the rest; but it's
a higher maintena
> --
> \ “That's the essence of science: Ask an impertinent question, |
> `\ and you're on the way to the pertinent answer.” —Jacob |
> _o__) Boronowski, _The Ascent of Man_, 1976 |
> Ben Finney
That nose keeps reminding me of the start of one of the
On Jul 9, 8:38 pm, Ben Finney wrote:
> Phlip writes:
> > On Jul 9, 7:39 pm, mark curphey wrote:
>
> > > Thanks. FWIW I played with a bunch (Freshen, Morelia, Lettuce)
>
> > Morelia is "undermaintained" because it's finished. It attaches to any
> > pre-existing TestCase-style test runner, hen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 2011.07.09 11:04 PM, Andrew Berg wrote:
>
> Is barf built-in as well?
>
That came off more hostile than I wanted, so I'll rephrase it:
I doubt it has anything to do with built-ins, since it fails on a
variable name that obviously does not re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 2011.07.09 09:54 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> "file" is a built-in (related to "open").
Also:
> Traceback (most recent call last): File
> "C:\Users\Bahamut\workspace\Disillusion\disillusion.py", line 178, in
> save_preset() File
> "C:\Users\
Phlip writes:
> On Jul 9, 7:39 pm, mark curphey wrote:
>
> > Thanks. FWIW I played with a bunch (Freshen, Morelia, Lettuce)
>
> Morelia is "undermaintained" because it's finished. It attaches to any
> pre-existing TestCase-style test runner, hence there's nothing to
> maintain!
It looks goo
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 10Jul2011 03:00, Alexander Kapps wrote:
> | On 10.07.2011 02:26, John Salerno wrote:
> | >I have a script that does some stuff that I want to run every day for
> | >maybe a week, or a month. So far I've been good about running it every
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 2011.07.09 09:54 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> "file" is a built-in (related to "open").
It is? What is it?
>>> type(file)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
NameError: name 'file' is not defined
I don't see it in
On Jul 9, 7:39 pm, mark curphey wrote:
> Thanks. FWIW I played with a bunch (Freshen, Morelia, Lettuce)
Morelia is "undermaintained" because it's finished. It attaches to any
pre-existing TestCase-style test runner, hence there's nothing to
maintain!
Packages like Lettuce rebuild the entire
On Saturday, July 9, 2011 2:28:58 PM UTC-7, Eric Snow wrote:
> A tracker issue [1] recently got me thinking about what makes
> functions special. The discussion there was regarding the distinction
> between compile time (generation of .pyc files for modules and
> execution of code blocks), [functi
On 2011.07.09 08:32 PM, Bruce Whealton wrote:
> Hello,
> So, I got this book on Programming the Semantic Web about
> the same time I started learning Python. The code seems to be
> developed for python 2.7 and not 3, I believe.
If you're going to learn Python 3, I suggest learning from
Thanks. FWIW I played with a bunch (Freshen, Morelia, Lettuce) over the
last few days and Lettuce appears to be the most "actively" maintained and
closest to a cucumber-like implementation IMHO. I have decided to adopt it for
now. I played with a few CI servers but Jenkins (Hudson) is tough
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> Eric Snow wrote:
>
>> Mostly I am just
>> trying to put together more pieces of the Python puzzle. In this case
>> I was trying to find out if the optimized execution of code objects
>> for functions is a part of the language or just an imp
On Jul 8, 9:36 pm, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark curphey, 09.07.2011 01:41:
>
> > And for CI having been using Hudson for a while, any real advantages in a
> > Python / Django world for adopting something native like Trac and one of
> > the CI plugins like Bitten?
I'm kind'a partial to Morelia fo
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Bruce Whealton wrote:
problem with is this line:
> def add(self, (sub, pred, obj)):
> I think the problem is with the parentheses before the sub. I removed those
> and that seemed to fix that error or make it go away. I don’t remember how I
> figured that
Thanks everyone! I probably should have said something like "Python,
if possible and efficient, otherwise any other method" ! :)
I'll look into the Task Scheduler. Thanks again!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 10Jul2011 03:00, Alexander Kapps wrote:
| On 10.07.2011 02:26, John Salerno wrote:
| >I have a script that does some stuff that I want to run every day for
| >maybe a week, or a month. So far I've been good about running it every
| >night, but is there some way (using Python, of course) that I
Hello,
So, I got this book on Programming the Semantic Web about the same
time I started learning Python. The code seems to be developed for python 2.7
and not 3, I believe. The code is here:
http://semprog.com/content/the-book/
I tried to run simpletriple.py from inside eclipse wit
Eric Snow wrote:
> Mostly I am just
> trying to put together more pieces of the Python puzzle. In this case
> I was trying to find out if the optimized execution of code objects
> for functions is a part of the language or just an implementation
> detail.
You keep using that phrase, "optimized e
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Eric Snow writes:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Ben Finney
>> wrote:
>> > Eric Snow writes:
>> >> No other objects have code objects. No other objects in Python have
>> >> this special optimization.
>> >
>> > Yes. The two facts are dir
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 7/9/2011 2:28 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
>>
>> A tracker issue [1] recently got me thinking about what makes
>> functions special. The discussion there was regarding the distinction
>> between compile time (generation of .pyc files for modules and
On 10.07.2011 02:26, John Salerno wrote:
I have a script that does some stuff that I want to run every day for
maybe a week, or a month. So far I've been good about running it every
night, but is there some way (using Python, of course) that I can make
it automatically run at a set time each nigh
Eric Snow writes:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Eric Snow writes:
> >> No other objects have code objects. No other objects in Python have
> >> this special optimization.
> >
> > Yes. The two facts are directly related.
[…]
> > Yes, functions are different and are tre
John Salerno writes:
> is there some way (using Python, of course) that I can make it
> automatically run at a set time each night?
You need to use whatever facilities your operating system has for
scheduled events. That's unrelated to the language you use for
implementing the program.
On a Uni
On 2011.07.09 07:26 PM, John Salerno wrote:
> I have a script that does some stuff that I want to run every day for
> maybe a week, or a month. So far I've been good about running it every
> night, but is there some way (using Python, of course) that I can make
> it automatically run at a set time
I have a script that does some stuff that I want to run every day for
maybe a week, or a month. So far I've been good about running it every
night, but is there some way (using Python, of course) that I can make
it automatically run at a set time each night?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listi
On 7/9/2011 2:28 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
A tracker issue [1] recently got me thinking about what makes
functions special. The discussion there was regarding the distinction
between compile time (generation of .pyc files for modules and
execution of code blocks), [function] definition time, and [fun
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Eric Snow writes:
>
>> A tracker issue [1] recently got me thinking about what makes
>> functions special.
>
> As you describe, functions are special for your scenario because a
> function definition needs to result in executable code as an obje
Eric Snow writes:
> A tracker issue [1] recently got me thinking about what makes
> functions special.
As you describe, functions are special for your scenario because a
function definition needs to result in executable code as an object.
> Definition time actually happens during compile time,
On 2011.07.09 06:06 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
> In a logging context at least, using the form like
>
> logger.debug("formatting message with %s", "arguments")
>
> rather than
>
> logger.debug("formatting message with %s" % "arguments")
How would I do that with the newer formatting? I've tried:
> logge
A tracker issue [1] recently got me thinking about what makes
functions special. The discussion there was regarding the distinction
between compile time (generation of .pyc files for modules and
execution of code blocks), [function] definition time, and [function]
execution time. Definition time
On 09.07.2011 22:45, smith jack wrote:
from threading import Thread
def calc(start, end):
total = 0;
for i in range(start, end + 1):
total += i;
print '--result:', total
return total
t = Thread(target=calc, args=(1,100))
t.start()
I have run thi
from threading import Thread
def calc(start, end):
total = 0;
for i in range(start, end + 1):
total += i;
print '--result:', total
return total
t = Thread(target=calc, args=(1,100))
t.start()
I have run this program for many times,and the result is alw
Hey I've been trying to convert this to run through ctypes and i'm
having a hard time
typedef struct _SYSTEM_PROCESS_ID_INFORMATION
{
HANDLE ProcessId;
UNICODE_STRING ImageName;
} SYSTEM_PROCESS_IMAGE_NAME_INFORMATION,
*PSYSTEM_PROCESS_IMAGE_NAME_INFORMATION;
to
class SYSTEM_PROCESS_ID_I
Hi all,
I am currently working on a HTTP Proxy. For maximum flexibility, I am
implementing the proxy at a low level : I am using the SocketServer library.
The server itself is very simple:
class MyTCPServer(SocketServer.TCPServer):
allow_reuse_address = 1
and the handler looks like:
cla
Andrew Berg gmail.com> writes:
> Other than the case where a variable isn't a string (format() converts
> variables to strings, automatically, right?) and when a variable is used
> a bunch of times, concatenation is fine, but somehow, it seems wrong.
> Sorry if this seems a bit silly, but I'm a n
39 matches
Mail list logo
