Hi,
not yet, I will check it today, thanks for the idea !
We may have some deeper problem...
Br,
Peter.
On 10/15/2011 05:46 PM, ext Kev Dwyer wrote:
Peter G. Marczis wrote:
Hello Peter,
Welcome to the list.
Have you tried calling statvfs from a C program? What happens if you do?
Best
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:59:44 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Chris Kaynor
> wrote:
>> Python 2.6 running on Windows 7:
> 99.0**99**99
>> OverflowError: (34, 'Result too large') Traceback (most recent call
>> last):
>> File "", line 1, in
>> OverflowError: (34, 'R
- Original Message -
> From: Noah Hall
> To: MrPink
> Cc: python-list@python.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 4:44 AM
> Subject: Re: How to test if object is an integer?
> There's the isdigit method, for example -
>
str = "1324325"
str.isdigit()
> True
str = "
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Chris Kaynor wrote:
> Python 2.6 running on Windows 7:
99.0**99**99
> OverflowError: (34, 'Result too large')
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> OverflowError: (34, 'Result too large')
>
> However, from the documentation:
> "Becaus
Python 2.6 running on Windows 7:
>>> 99.0**99**99
OverflowError: (34, 'Result too large')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
OverflowError: (34, 'Result too large')
However, from the documentation:
"Because of the lack of standardization of floating point exception
handling
In article ,
Mathias Lafeldt wrote:
> According to [1], there're more Exceptions to test for:
>
> try:
> int(s)
> return True
> except (TypeError, ValueError, OverflowError): # int conversion failed
> return False
I don't think I would catch TypeError here. It kind of depends on
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Noah Hall wrote:
> There's the isdigit method, for example -
>
str = "1324325"
str.isdigit()
> True
str = "1232.34"
str.isdigit()
> False
str = "I am a string, not an int!"
str.isdigit()
> False
That works for non-negative base-10 int
Ganesh Gopalakrishnan writes:
> Thanks to all who replied - also to Ben.
You're welcome. (Please don't top-post your replies.)
> Needless to say I'm new to Python.
Welcome to this forum, then! You would be wise to get a solid grounding
in Python by working through the Python tutorial from begi
DevPlayer writes:
> Do you not see? For ...
> One man's delusion is another man's epiphany.
> One man's untruth is another man's belief.
> One man's logical undenighable truth is another man's small part of a
> bigger picture.
Those are just not true.
A belief that doesn't match reality is a de
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:44 AM, MrPink wrote:
>
> Is there a function in Python that can be used to test if the value in
> a string is an integer? I had to make one up for myself and it looks
> like this:
>
> def isInt(s):
> try:
> i = int(s)
> return True
> except ValueErro
Thanks to all who replied - also to Ben. I had foolishly assumed that
the same set exhibits the same rep on at least one platform. Like any
bug, the falsity of my assumption took months to expose - till then,
things had worked fine. Needless to say I'm new to Python. (The double
printing is be
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 1:44 AM, MrPink wrote:
>
> Is there a function in Python that can be used to test if the value in
> a string is an integer? I had to make one up for myself and it looks
> like this:
>
> def isInt(s):
> try:
> i = int(s)
> return True
> except ValueError
I just wanted to bump this back onto the list since I posted over the
weekend.
Thanks,
Ethan
On 10/15/2011 11:17 AM, Ethan Swint wrote:
Hi-
I'm experiencing crashes in my Win32 Python 2.7 application which
appear to be linked to pyzmq. At the moment, I can't even kill the
"python.exe *32"
Steven: Thanks for those tips, I've implemented all of them. Also only
allowing whitelisted variable names. Feeling much more confident.
-- Gnarlie
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Oct 17, 10:34 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 05:59:04 -0700, DevPlayer wrote:
> > As has been said for example does 1+1 = 2. Only in one small
> > persepective. Whaa? what wack job says stuff like that? 1+1 = 10. In the
> > bigger picture there is more then one numberic base b
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 05:59:04 -0700, DevPlayer wrote:
> As has been said for example does 1+1 = 2. Only in one small
> persepective. Whaa? what wack job says stuff like that? 1+1 = 10. In the
> bigger picture there is more then one numberic base besides decimal,
> such as binary.
That is no more d
Am 16.10.2011 10:03, schrieb masood shaik:
I am trying to call python function from c code.The following
program i got from the web source while i am trying to run this
program it throws an segmentation fault.
Try checking what functions returns instead of blindly using it.
Use a debugger to fi
On Oct 14, 7:32 pm, alex23 wrote:
> You can do this right now with Python 3.2+ and concurrent.futures:
>
> from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
You may have finally sold me on struggling through the upgrade from
Python 2.6! I've been doing reasonably well with the Multiprocessing
m
> DevPlayer wrote:
> >I still assert that contradiction is caused by narrow perspective.
> >By that I mean: just because an objects scope may not see a certain
> >condition, doesn't mean that condition is non-existant.
> Groetjes Albert wrote:
> This is a far cry from the bible stating that someo
On Oct 16, 11:55 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:43:20 -0700, Shane wrote:
> > Normally if one has a code set under a directory "top_level" like this:
>
> > top_level:
> > __main__.py
> > a
> > __init__.py
> > b
> > __init__.py
>
> > then this directo
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:32:00 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> So, bringing this back to your examples...
>
> Both t and t1 are classes, both know their internal name as "F", but
> they are different classes, as seen by the fact that their IDs are
> different.
Oops, no, sorry, a mistake... assumin
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:43:20 -0700, Shane wrote:
> Normally if one has a code set under a directory "top_level" like this:
>
> top_level:
>__main__.py
>a
> __init__.py
> b
> __init__.py
>
> then this directory structure is naturally satisfies this line in
> __main__.
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:11:18 -0700, Shane wrote:
> In the following t,t1 are the result of built-in call type() -- the form
> that takes three arguments.
Are you sure about that? Because my explanation below will depend
entirely on this alleged fact: that t and t1 themselves are classes, not
in
On Oct 17, 9:11 am, Shane wrote:
> I now have two questions: How does Python allow two classes of the
> same
> type as evidenced by identical ``print type()' output and
> different id
> outputs?
You are looking at the id of two _instances_ of the class, not of the
class itself.
>>> class Example
Normally if one has a code set under a directory "top_level" like
this:
top_level:
__main__.py
a
__init__.py
b
__init__.py
then this directory structure is naturally satisfies this line in
__main__.py:
>import a.b
But support, for some stupid reason --- say a.b is use
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:41:55 -0700, Gnarlodious wrote:
> On Oct 16, 5:25 pm, Steven D'Aprano +comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
>
>> How do you sanitize user input?
> Thanks for your concern. This is what I now have, which merely expands
> each value into its usable type (unquotes them):
>
Hi there,
I've created a wx NoteBook in wich I set multiples panels in wich I
set one or more sizers. But nothing displays in the notebook,
everything is outside. I've been searching an answer for 2 days ><.
Can you help me plz ? Here is my code(with only one panel, to sum up
the code) :
class St
On Oct 16, 5:25 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> How do you sanitize user input?
Thanks for your concern. This is what I now have, which merely expands
each value into its usable type (unquotes them):
# filter each value
try:
var=int(var)
except ValueError:
if var in ('False', 'True'):
v
Ganesh Gopalakrishnan writes:
> This probably is known, but a potential pitfall (was, for me) nevertheless.
> I suspect it is due to hash collisions between 's3' and 's13' in this
> case?
What is the actual problem? What behaviour is occurring that doesn't
match your expectation?
> >>> S1==S2
>
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 00:18:40 -0700, Jon Clements wrote:
> On Oct 16, 12:53 am, PoD wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 11:00:17 -0700, Gnarlodious wrote:
>> > What is the best way (Python 3) to loop through dict keys, examine
>> > the string, change them if needed, and save the changes to the same
>> >
In the following t,t1 are the result of built-in call type() -- the
form that takes three arguments.
Therefore they are classes. Consider the following output:
print type(t)
>
print id(t)
>1234567
print t.__module__
>a.b.t.d
print type(t1)
>
print id(t1)
>1234568
print t1.__module__
>a.b.t.d
I n
On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:20:49 -0700, Gnarlodious wrote:
> On Oct 15, 5:53 pm, PoD wrote:
>
>> data = {
>> 'Mobile': 'string',
>> 'context': '',
>> 'order': '7',
>> 'time': 'True'}
>> types={'Mobile':str,'context':str,'order':int,'time':bool}
>>
>> for k,v in data.items():
>> d
http://www.isup.me/python.org ;)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 10:21 AM, 8 dihedral
wrote:
> Uh, sounds reasonable, if one loops over an index variable that could be
> altered during the loop execution then the loop may not end as expected.
>From the docs: "Iterating views while adding or deleting entries in
the dictionary may
On 10/17/2011 5:19 AM, Peter Otten wrote:
The getattr() call is just a distraction. Every x.pop attribute access
creates a new method object. In the case of
x.pop is x.pop
False
they have to reside in memory simultaneously while in the expression
id(x.pop) == id(x.pop)
True
a list.pop me
Uh, sounds reasonable, if one loops over an index variable that could be
altered during the loop execution then the loop may not end as expected.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:16, Jan Sundström wrote:
> On 16 Okt, 06:59, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
>> On Oct 15, 1:13 pm, Jan Sundström wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> `import curses` should work. What exactly is the error message? Does
>> `import curses` work outside your program/program directory?
>>
>> The c
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 05:52:03PM -0600, Ganesh Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> This probably is known, but a potential pitfall (was, for me)
> nevertheless. I suspect it is due to hash collisions between 's3'
> and 's13' in this case? It happens only rarely, depending on the
> contents of the set.
>
> >
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Gnarlodious wrote:
> On Oct 15, 5:53 pm, PoD wrote:
>
>> types={'Mobile':str,'context':str,'order':int,'time':bool}
>>
>> for k,v in data.items():
>> data[k] = types[k](v)
>
> Thanks for the tip, I didn't know you could do that. I ended up
> filtering the valu
On Oct 15, 5:53 pm, PoD wrote:
> data = {
> 'Mobile': 'string',
> 'context': '',
> 'order': '7',
> 'time': 'True'}
> types={'Mobile':str,'context':str,'order':int,'time':bool}
>
> for k,v in data.items():
> data[k] = types[k](v)
Thanks for the tip, I didn't know you could do
On 16 Okt, 06:59, Christoph Gohlke wrote:
> On Oct 15, 1:13 pm, Jan Sundström wrote:
>
>
>
> `import curses` should work. What exactly is the error message? Does
> `import curses` work outside your program/program directory?
>
> The curses package is part of the standard library and usually
> ins
http://123maza.com/48/silver424/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 10/17/2011 4:42 AM, Yingjie Lan wrote:
Hi all,
This is quite strange when I used the Python shell with IDLE:
Nothing to do with IDLE
>>> x = []
>> id(getattr(x, 'pop')) == id(x.pop)
True
>>> getattr(x, 'pop') is x.pop
False
I suppose since the two things have the same id, the 'is'-
Yingjie Lan wrote:
> This is quite strange when I used the Python shell with IDLE:
>
x = []
id(getattr(x, 'pop')) == id(x.pop)
>
> True
getattr(x, 'pop') is x.pop
> False
>
> I suppose since the two things have the same id, the 'is'-test
> should give a True value, but I ge
The original message was received at Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:13:39 +0300
from python.org [153.233.80.188]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
- Transcript of session follows -
while talking to python.org.:
>>> MAIL From:"Automatic Email Delivery Software"
<<< 50
Hi all,
This is quite strange when I used the Python shell with IDLE:
>>> x = []
>>> id(getattr(x, 'pop')) == id(x.pop)
True
>>> getattr(x, 'pop') is x.pop
False
>>>
I suppose since the two things have the same id, the 'is'-test
should give a True value, but I get a False value.
Any partic
46 matches
Mail list logo